Main Injection pulsewidth axis change

[vortecfcar]

Guy's running scripts be careful!

I had to adjust all of my LMM library scripts to fit this new axis on the LMM. Your tables will be way off if you use scripts from old EFILive versions.

:cheers:

Nick

[8100 Power]

Guy's running scripts be careful!

I had to adjust all of my LMM library scripts to fit this new axis on the LMM. Your tables will be way off if you use scripts from old EFILive versions.

:cheers:

Nick

Nick, does this just apply to the LMM's?

[Dozerboy]

When did the axis change?

[vortecfcar]

Nick, does this just apply to the LMM's?

Far as I've noticed, yes


When did the axis change?

Ross or Paul will have to answer that. I have Version 7.5.6 build 99 and it's different.

Nick

[bballer182]

Far as I've noticed, yes



Ross or Paul will have to answer that. I have Version 7.5.6 build 99 and it's different.

Nick

i believe it got goofed in one of the calz releases. and i think the LBZ was goofed too!

[vortecfcar]

LBZ stuff may be goofed too, albeit to a much smaller degree. My scripts appear to be hitting the 20mm3 mark now where they used to hit the 30mm3. I can't say for sure though because I don't have an old version of the software handy. Both computers were updated. Can we please not change the axis markers on this table from now on!

Any script that changes the 20mm3 row in the main injection pulsewidth table (B0720) will result in a surge at cold idle until I can update the LBZ stuff. In the meantime, put your stock 20mm3 row back in the main injection pulsewidth table.

Nick

[bballer182]

This is a thread that was started a while ago and has to do a little with what you are talking about. i think

http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?t=10856

[vortecfcar]

That thread has a nice picture of the old pulsewidth scaling in it, otherwise totally different discussion. :)

[GMPX]

The axis change came in with the LMM.
Maybe GM felt they were wasting much of the table on the LBZ with such a small spread at the start, instead now they have a breakpoints a little more evenly spread.
Nick, my notes on the Bosch ECM cal files say this:

2009-Oct-19 - Fixed LMM Fuel Pulse mm3 axis

If you made scripts prior to that then they will be wrong as they had the LBZ axis scaling.

Cheers,
Ross

[bballer182]

The axis change came in with the LMM.
Maybe GM felt they were wasting much of the table on the LBZ with such a small spread at the start, instead now they have a breakpoints a little more evenly spread.
Nick, my notes on the Bosch ECM cal files say this:

2009-Oct-19 - Fixed LMM Fuel Pulse mm3 axis

If you made scripts prior to that then they will be wrong as they had the LBZ axis scaling.

Cheers,
Ross

So the break points are correct on the LBZ then right?

[vortecfcar]

To add to this craziness...

I'm on build 7.5.6 build 99. I open an 8594 single tune and my main pulse axis ends with:
80,85,90,95,105,120

Same build, same table in a DSP5 8594 tune has this axis at: 80,90,100,110,120

This is reeking havoc on scripting.

[GMPX]

Nick, I am not seeing that here, the axis matches the normal table on all DSP tunes (80,85,90,95,105,120). I have .calz file 7.24, December 03, 2009. Is that what you have?

Cheers,
Ross

[killerbee]

To add to this craziness...

I'm on build 7.5.6 build 99. I open an 8594 single tune and my main pulse axis ends with:
80,85,90,95,105,120

Same build, same table in a DSP5 8594 tune has this axis at: 80,90,100,110,120

This is reeking havoc on scripting.

I have just decided to bail out of all dsp jobs until this gets sorted out. It is frustrating as heck. waiting.

[IdahoRob]

This bit me in the arse last month. I had to spend many hours on rebuilding all the LMM scrips. I had some unhappy customers for a time.