PDA

View Full Version : B1059



duramaximizer
January 24th, 2010, 01:41 PM
What does this table control? The FPR or the injectors. I am going to look at it more tomarrow.

On edit, I am assuming the FRP since it's under the FP heading. Just wondering if anyone messed with it.

bballer182
January 24th, 2010, 01:47 PM
controls the CP3. the PW and pressure should match the fuel flow base. the table is more of a "checking" device than anything.

duramaximizer
January 24th, 2010, 02:23 PM
I think B1050 B1051 and B1052 are labeled backwards according to my logging. I think the high altitude is actually low altitude and the low altitude should be labeled high. Anyone else notice this? I live at 800 feet and it is running in a high altitude FR table.

bballer182
January 24th, 2010, 02:32 PM
not having any log from an LMM. I would assume that they are correct since in the LBZ tuning as barometric pressure decreases B1006 and B1007 take FP away not add it.

duramaximizer
January 24th, 2010, 02:48 PM
Take a look at this. It shows I am running in the middle table to the high altitude.

bballer182
January 24th, 2010, 03:06 PM
Have you taken into consideration ALL of the modifier tables?

duramaximizer
January 24th, 2010, 03:25 PM
114MPa Base Low altitude-16.6 etc modifier=97.4 No where near the 67.4 that it ends at in the log. (using frame 14 for reference) A difference of 30.

High Altitude is 71.5 MPa-8.7=62.8 A difference of 4.6.

Medium Altitude 114 MPa - 23=91 A different of 23.6

The high altitude is the closest figure to the log that I could get when modifiers were taken into consideration. Unless there is another modifier. I am at 800 feet approx.

GMPX
January 24th, 2010, 04:48 PM
Where you logging baro pressure?
I'm pretty sure the tables are set out correct, if you are running DSP5 then all those tables will be wrong too :shock:

duramaximizer
January 25th, 2010, 06:00 AM
I don't think I was. I am not running DSP at all. I will log baro today to check against it.

duramaximizer
January 25th, 2010, 03:32 PM
This log is showing 13.9 as barometric pressure a consistant cruise at frame 4970 you can see where the numbers came from that I posted earlier.

I just now figured out how to change the PIDs for sucessful BBL (even though I am obviously doing it wrong per my post bump :bad:). This is going to be sweet now that I am figuring it out. :doh2:

bballer182
January 25th, 2010, 05:59 PM
13.9 psi is a little on the low side for 800 ft of elevation. however your logs match the high altitude pressure table

duramaximizer
January 26th, 2010, 12:03 AM
So, I will only get higher....that's nice to have some useless tables.

duramaximizer
January 26th, 2010, 12:45 PM
Anyone live in high altitude and check the fuel pressure table to see if it's still reading the high altitude table?

GMPX
January 26th, 2010, 02:00 PM
I'm adding in some more correction tables (and factor tables), I don't think this is your problem but it may reveal something.
Your log numbers do indicate it's using the high alt table, but, let me add these new tables in and see how it looks then.

Cheers,
Ross

duramaximizer
January 26th, 2010, 02:22 PM
THANK You!

GMPX
January 27th, 2010, 05:03 PM
Please see THIS (http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?t=12912) thread.

duramaximizer
January 28th, 2010, 01:18 PM
Still not sure everything is right it is better. I wish the scan would follow the tune NEW table to try and figure out what it is thinking. I am still trying to figure out what/how B1059 relates in the equation. It has to be a multiplier or something but how do you take into acount the mm per sec with something measured in MPa?

GMPX
January 28th, 2010, 01:21 PM
I wish the scan would follow the tune NEW table to try and figure out what it is thinking. bballer182 to the rescue, see HERE (http://forum.efilive.com/showpost.php?p=114121&postcount=7).