CalcVET Question

[BlackSS]

I tried the CalcVET and when I copied over to the Main VE table the data doesn't look right to me. Could someone help me with what I did wrong. Thank you.

Here is a copy of my log and tune file:

[joecar]

This is what I get from your files:

12376 12377


(remember the VET map is pasted-with-labels straight into the VE table)

[joecar]

Post pics of your map and the VE table after you past-with-labels.

[BlackSS]

Here is what I come up with
12378 12378

This is without smoothing the VE table but my concern was with numbers going from the 40s, 50s, etc. down to 1-2.

[BlackSS]

Sorry, here is the VE table
12379

[BlackSS]

Here is the VE table after smoothing:
12380

My numbers are different than yours so I'm not sure what I'm doing different.

[joecar]

Ok, this is the problem: your tunetool is displaying B0101 VE table in units [%], whereas your scantool map is displaying in units [g*K/kPa].

So you have to be sure to use the same units in tunetool and scantool;

you can do this by doing one (and only one) of these:
- in the tunetool, go Edit->Properties and set the VE units to g*K/kPa,
- in the scantool, for the map data use CALC.VET.% (i.e. the one with % units);


when the units match, your scantool map data would be much closer to the VE table cell values.

[joecar]

BTW: remember to:
- eliminate map cells that have low count (empty).
- apply the transient filter.

[BlackSS]

Under edit map properties > empty (tab) I checked hide empty cells and set the low count to 10. Is there something else I should change?

[joecar]

Under edit map properties > empty (tab) I checked hide empty cells and set the low count to 10. Is there something else I should change?10 or 20 is fine.

[BlackSS]

Ok, when I get back to my computer, I'll change the units so that they match and see what I come up with. Thanks for the help.