PDA

View Full Version : Flex fuel tune commanding 11:1 afr



carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 04:22 AM
Like the title says i am running a flex fuel tune and i just got it working but now that its saying it sees 60% ethanol (which is low but whatever) its commanding an afr of 11:1 or so do i need to change the method im using to display the units so that it plays nicely?? Im using afr because the eqr settings are greek to me... do I need to learn it or can I stick to what im familiar with without pulling my hair out??

:edit: I know that the way it displays the units to me has nothing to do with how the pcm sees them but from what I can tell in my tune everything looks like it should play nice.. am I missing something because of the way I have it displaying to me or is there something I am missing all together??

carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 04:59 AM
I also have my lc1 set up to read afr as well and I know there are a ton of variables that can be easily overlooked because of the different methods of reading and displaying fuel mixture via wideband... here is a copy of my tune if anyone wants to take a peek at it.. 13235

GMPX
May 24th, 2012, 09:00 AM
That sounds about right actually, I checked a log from my car when it had just 26% ethanol and commanded AFR never got higher than 13.2, even at idle. Unfortunately one of the negatives with E85 is the increased fuel consumption because it has to run a lot richer all the time.

carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 09:22 AM
actually i totally agree that that sounds correct for an actual afr but I think maybe I should have maybe been more clear (was eating lunch and posting with my phone) I have been tuning it as if it had gas in it rather than E85 and realistically as long as everything is correct it (the engine) really doesnt know the difference if one is still using the WB02 with the 14.7 stoch desired oxygen content is the same in the exhaust regardless of fuel being used. I guess where my confusion comes in is what do i need to change to make all the numbers play nice with eachother (pcm vs WB02)???? If i run an AUTOVE right now its going to try to about double the fuel due to my WB02 wanting stoch at 14.7 and the pcm wanting it at 11:1 or roughly thereabout.. I am very unfamiliar with anything other than a 14.7 stoch since that is what i have used for years tuning cars.... I would very much like to keep using that as the stoch at least on the display for my lc1 until I figure out what means what (if possible) but at the same time I need to make everything play nice so I can redo my tune via AUTOVE since my "flex fuel" sensor works now and everything is all out of whack.... Thanks, Jake

carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 10:16 AM
Unfortunately one of the negatives with E85 is the increased fuel consumption because it has to run a lot richer all the time.

In my experience mileage is not much different on an engine that is tuned properly for E85. Also the higher the ethanol content the better and its easier it is to tune for it properly because it becomes less prone to detonation. E85 is also a ton more forgiving when the tune isnt quite right....

GMPX
May 24th, 2012, 12:06 PM
In my experience mileage is not much different on an engine that is tuned properly for E85.
So what is the trick? From factory it's usually a big difference.

joecar
May 24th, 2012, 12:07 PM
To make all the numbers match do the following:
- test the alcohol content of your fuel to determine the stoich AFR ($30 kit);
- set that stoich AFR value in B3601 and flash the tune into the PCM;
- log GM.EQIVRATIO (commanded fuel/air) and EXT.WO2EQR1 (measured fuel/air), these will match if your airmass models are correct.

joecar
May 24th, 2012, 12:10 PM
Take WO2AFR1 and divide by 14.7 (giving you Lambda or 1/EQR) and multiply by the stoich AFR of your fuel.


Or take WO2LAM1 and multiply by the stoich AFR of your fuel.

carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 12:19 PM
So what is the trick? From factory it's usually a big difference.

u can get away with a leaner tune safely and it likes timing.... just dont go nutts on it cuz it will go the other way... Also I usually lean toward the higher side of compression ratios than I probably should too and in my opinion E85 likes as much as you can give it.. makes normal fuel a bit** tho and some guys will argue that one all the way to the bank.. I dunno I just play till its happy.... I constantly tune my stuff even if its really good, for me thats the fun part. If it couldnt be tinkered with for me there wouldnt be a point. If i could just push a button and it was perfect it would be way too boring and i would find a new thing to play with cuz thats just plain boring.. I have yet to blow an engine up on E85 that I could blame on anything but my utter stupidity (was other issues but i knew about them and beat on it anyway).

carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 12:24 PM
and like i said before the less gas you have the more you can tune it for the E85 and see the benifits.. If you are running 26% Ethnol then you are literally seeing the worst of both worlds.. detonation properties of regular gas so u cant turn up timing and the lower btu of the ethanol hampering the economy because you cant tune properly....

carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 12:34 PM
To make all the numbers match do the following:
- test the alcohol content of your fuel to determine the stoich AFR ($30 kit);
- set that stoich AFR value in B3601 and flash the tune into the PCM;
- log GM.EQIVRATIO (commanded fuel/air) and EXT.WO2EQR1 (measured fuel/air), these will match if your airmass models are correct.

I have the tester and it tests at 68% but im not sure what you are saying.. Im running on like 4 hours of sleep and im hoping your post will make better sense tomorrow when my brain is functioning better. Thank you for the replies and I will reread and reply in the AM and hopefully my brain will be on then :-)

GMPX
May 24th, 2012, 01:34 PM
If you are running 26% Ethnol then you are literally seeing the worst of both worlds
Unfortunately E85 is not on every street corner, you get it when it's around. Otherwise it ends up as a left over mix (eg 26%)

carlsonauto
May 24th, 2012, 01:45 PM
Unfortunately E85 is not on every street corner, you get it when it's around. Otherwise it ends up as a left over mix (eg 26%)

Thats unfortunate.... i absolutely love it as a perfomance fuel.... but on the other hand i think its absolutely silly to run in a car thats tuned for normal gas ie factory "flex fuel" vehicle... granted there is a "modified tune" but still dollar for dollar its just not practical..... tuned properly efilive style tho..... thats different...

carlsonauto
May 25th, 2012, 12:18 AM
To make all the numbers match do the following:
- test the alcohol content of your fuel to determine the stoich AFR ($30 kit);
- set that stoich AFR value in B3601 and flash the tune into the PCM;
- log GM.EQIVRATIO (commanded fuel/air) and EXT.WO2EQR1 (measured fuel/air), these will match if your airmass models are correct.

Ok thats not at all complicated I have no clue why that seemed like it was a different language last night.... so with my wideband setup as it is the pid EXT.W02EQR1 will work then??? if so then what do I need to change in the map for doing AUTOVE?? the parameter to external wideband eqr?? sorry if these are stupid questions but this part of the tuning is all new to me (i just cant keep anything simple) :-)

carlsonauto
May 25th, 2012, 01:34 AM
well I have been screwing around with it and I do believe I need a pid similar to the calc.ben pid that uses eqr instead of afr.. Correct?? I cant seem to figure out how to create a pid tho.... am I crazy or am I on the right track??

joecar
May 25th, 2012, 07:43 AM
Have a look at the calc_pids.txt file in post #1 here: A-New-Twist-on-CALC-VE-Table-Computing-the-Entire-VE-Table (http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?15236-A-New-Twist-on-CALC-VE-Table-Computing-the-Entire-VE-Table&p=135867#post135867)


More info (see posts #2 and #29): Summary-Notes (http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?14188-Summary-Notes&p=127351#post127351)

carlsonauto
May 25th, 2012, 08:26 AM
Have a look at the calc_pids.txt file in post #1 here: A-New-Twist-on-CALC-VE-Table-Computing-the-Entire-VE-Table (http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?15236-A-New-Twist-on-CALC-VE-Table-Computing-the-Entire-VE-Table&p=135867#post135867)


More info (see posts #2 and #29): Summary-Notes (http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?14188-Summary-Notes&p=127351#post127351)

I messed with it all day and searched and searched and read a lot and finally I just started over and I had it figured out in a matter of 20 minutes.... I was driving/logging when you replied... At least it seems to be working properly now anyhow... Im using CALC.WB02BEN and EXT.W02LAM1 for my new pids and It seems correct... Something else in the tune is waaaay off because its a turd.... bigtime... Is there any way to compare files from different OS without doing it manually one at a time?? I cant remember everything that I changed in the previous tune that worked quite well...