View Full Version : Comparing 2 logs with different timing.
05gmcsierra
November 2nd, 2012, 04:46 PM
im going to the track on sunday and im trying to dial in my tune.. at this point i wont be able to make it to the dyno to check at what timing i make the most hp but i did log 2 runs one with 28* anthter with 30*.. being fairly new at tuning i cant really compare and tell which one is better.. i know many great tuners out there can. was wondering if anyone can take a look at it and let me know what they think? its a 5.3 on 227/232 609/598 112+2 cam and 4k stall on a 4x4 ecsb.. really appreciate it thanks1412114122
05gmcsierra
November 3rd, 2012, 12:46 PM
Any help?
joecar
November 7th, 2012, 02:48 PM
Your O2 sensor voltages at WOT indicate you're not sufficiently rich enough to be safe;
with 30° of timing advance you're dangerously close to combustion chamber damage;
the second log shows knock with 30° advance...
the first log shows no knock with 28°, I like this better.
05gmcsierra
November 7th, 2012, 02:50 PM
Joecar I have an Afr on the truck its reading about 12.9 at wot
joecar
November 7th, 2012, 02:59 PM
Try going a little richer, try to get the wideband to read 12.6.
05gmcsierra
November 7th, 2012, 03:03 PM
OK... I'll b at the track again tomorrow to compare... my question is what log looks better the 28* log or the 30*? I'll ad more fuel later tonight
joecar
November 7th, 2012, 03:45 PM
I like 4k28 better.
05gmcsierra
November 7th, 2012, 03:49 PM
Thanks... I liked that one too.. looks like my grams/cylinder seem a bit higher.. I'll do a richer pass and log tomorrow... thanks joecar
05gmcsierra
November 18th, 2012, 07:57 PM
Joecar sorry hadnt driven the truck since i got my DD driver now but finally took it for a spin loaded the 28* tune and got my wideband reading 12.5-12.6 and this is what i got.. looking at it by my personal experience it looks much better let me know what u think.. thanks..14188
05gmcsierra
December 1st, 2012, 05:54 AM
any get a chance to look at the latest log??? i think thats gonna do it. truck doesnt feel to much different but log looks better than the 30* log... AFR reads all the way up to 12.4 at points but stays in the 12.6 area
joecar
December 1st, 2012, 03:06 PM
I'm sorry I had a very busy week, I'll look at it tomorrow (I sent myself a pm to remind me).
joecar
December 3rd, 2012, 08:42 AM
HO2Sx1 show that you're not sufficiently rich at WOT ( however you need a wideband to tell you exactly how lean it is )
and with 28° of timing this means the combustion chamber temps may be dangerously high (even if knock is not detected/reported)...
joecar
December 3rd, 2012, 08:45 AM
MAF has some large fluctuations, seems like the PCM is filtering/smoothing it.
05gmcsierra
December 3rd, 2012, 10:19 AM
JoeCar where should my HO2Sx1 be reading? i do have a wideband i just dont connect it to efi live when i log. but like i said wideband reads from 12.4-12.6 from 0-100mph.. i might need to calibrate it again. i have the Lc-1 innovative.. with the MAF having large fluctuations what can be done to fix it?
joecar
December 3rd, 2012, 10:27 AM
I like to see HO2Sx1 read 920+ mV at WOT.
joecar
December 3rd, 2012, 10:27 AM
What fuel are you using...?
05gmcsierra
December 3rd, 2012, 12:24 PM
I'm using 91.. out here 870-890mv is where we like to c it.. my wideband is reading 12.6.. 920s would make it read in the 11.8.. which is a bit rich for an NA truck
joecar
December 3rd, 2012, 11:43 PM
Is your fuel E00/gasoline or E10...?
You can't really correlate between wideband and narrowband like that (you will find that 900-920mV will be close to 12.5)...
anything less than 900mV usually is lean (but not necessarily).
05gmcsierra
December 4th, 2012, 02:47 AM
I'll log with my wideband connected to EFI next time...so u can c what I mean by its running 12.6 AFR
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.