mtnman
April 13th, 2006, 11:36 AM
Since my LC-1 has crapped out on me during the VE tune, I created a tune that is in SD closed loop and added the stock VE table + 1%.
After flashing the tune and going for a drive, I monitored the LONGFT1 min, avg, and max values. The max was quite lean, so I have repeated this process of bumping the VE table by 1% then monitoring LONGFT1 until the current tune where I am at 7% added to the VE table. At first LONGFT1 showed a max around 2.0 and the average was -0.1 and min was -4.0, then after about 8 miles of driving, i noticed that the min and max values started looking just like the values for the 6% VE table tune. What's going on, is the PCM adjusting the Table regardless of its initial values? Do I need to bump up the VE table values more to something like 10% ? Should I be looking at LONGFTAVG1 instead (although it seems to stay at 0% the entire time for min, avg and max values)
After flashing the tune and going for a drive, I monitored the LONGFT1 min, avg, and max values. The max was quite lean, so I have repeated this process of bumping the VE table by 1% then monitoring LONGFT1 until the current tune where I am at 7% added to the VE table. At first LONGFT1 showed a max around 2.0 and the average was -0.1 and min was -4.0, then after about 8 miles of driving, i noticed that the min and max values started looking just like the values for the 6% VE table tune. What's going on, is the PCM adjusting the Table regardless of its initial values? Do I need to bump up the VE table values more to something like 10% ? Should I be looking at LONGFTAVG1 instead (although it seems to stay at 0% the entire time for min, avg and max values)