PDA

View Full Version : WO2S11 return wrong data



wesam
January 28th, 2021, 11:44 AM
I'm new for V8 scanner
It seems that when I connect AEM UEGO 30-0334 and adjust the WO2S11 to log via OBD2 it will return wrong data ( Lambda = 113 !! )

Any help will be appreciated


Thanks

Blacky
January 28th, 2021, 04:09 PM
I'm new for V8 scanner
It seems that when I connect AEM UEGO 30-0334 and adjust the WO2S11 to log via OBD2 it will return wrong data ( Lambda = 113 !! )

Any help will be appreciated


Thanks

Hi Wesam,

With the wide band connected, display the wide band data on FlashScans screen:
On V2 and V3, use the option: Scan Tool -> F2: Data Logging -> F3: Display W02.

Let it show the wide band data for 5-10 seconds, note down the approx. ranges of Lambda that were displayed (like, 100-120), then save and attach a COM data trace file from the FlashScan device itself.
That will capture/show the raw data coming from the wideband.

To capture the COM data:
On V2,use the option: Scan Tool -> F3: Scan Options -> F4: Save COM Data.
On V3, use the option: Scan Tool -> F3: Scan Options -> F2: Save COM Data.

Regards
Paul

wesam
January 28th, 2021, 11:33 PM
Hi Wesam,

With the wide band connected, display the wide band data on FlashScans screen:
On V2 and V3, use the option: Scan Tool -> F2: Data Logging -> F3: Display W02.

Let it show the wide band data for 5-10 seconds, note down the approx. ranges of Lambda that were displayed (like, 100-120), then save and attach a COM data trace file from the FlashScan device itself.
That will capture/show the raw data coming from the wideband.

To capture the COM data:
On V2,use the option: Scan Tool -> F3: Scan Options -> F4: Save COM Data.
On V3, use the option: Scan Tool -> F3: Scan Options -> F2: Save COM Data.

Regards
Paul

After a lot of tests it seems just my new V3 is returning false data my V2 returning correct lambda
i tried to display lambda on both V2 and V3 BBX but it does not show any thing
on V3 it just makes a beep in V2 it says no Wo2 found but if I serial connect it it will log

joecar
January 31st, 2021, 01:48 PM
Did you save the com data and send it to Paul...?

wesam
January 31st, 2021, 04:57 PM
Did you save the com data and send it to Paul...?

I did not for two reasons
first when I tried to show WO2 data on V3 it does not show the WO2 data
second when I tried to BBX log and record it shows error: $01CD Requested file not found

wesam
February 1st, 2021, 10:04 PM
Hi Wesam,

With the wide band connected, display the wide band data on FlashScans screen:
On V2 and V3, use the option: Scan Tool -> F2: Data Logging -> F3: Display W02.

Let it show the wide band data for 5-10 seconds, note down the approx. ranges of Lambda that were displayed (like, 100-120), then save and attach a COM data trace file from the FlashScan device itself.
That will capture/show the raw data coming from the wideband.

To capture the COM data:
On V2,use the option: Scan Tool -> F3: Scan Options -> F4: Save COM Data.
On V3, use the option: Scan Tool -> F3: Scan Options -> F2: Save COM Data.

Regards
Paul

Trace and log sent to you Paul

Blacky
February 2nd, 2021, 10:34 AM
Trace and log sent to you Paul

Hi Wesam,

There is a fault in the V8 scan tool as follows:

By default the SAE PID WO2S11 is defined with a scale of 2/65535 = 3.0518E-5. That is also the scaling for lambda used by the wide band controller.
In later versions of the OBDII protocol, the SAE defined additional scaling options for the wide band PIDs that can be requested by the ECM. The controller that you are logging modified the scaling for the WO2S11 PID. That in turn affected the way the V8 scan tool scaled the lambda data returned by the wide band controller. That data from the wide band controller should not have been scaled as it was not transmitted by the ECM (which was the controller that modified the scaling) but was transmitted by the wide band controller (masquerading as a glow plug module) which did not request any modified scaling.

This issue will only occur when logging ECM controllers that modify the scaling of the PID WO2S11 (which is the PID the wide band controller uses to transmit wide band data).

Unfortunately there is no easy/quick fix for that particular issue. I have updated the V8 scan tool to not modify the scaling of PIDs that originate from the GPM (i.e wide band) even if/when the ECM requests modified scaling for that PID.
That update should be available as a beta release this week or early next week.

Regards
Paul

Blacky
February 2nd, 2021, 10:38 AM
Also, when using the AEM UEGO in CAN mode, you cannot use the V2/V3 on-screen display for wide band data. That is only for RS232 serial based wide band controllers.
When using the AEM UEGO in CAN mode, you can only monitor/log wide band data via the scan tool in pass-thru mode or via black box logging in stand alone mode.

Regards
Paul

wesam
February 2nd, 2021, 03:39 PM
Hi Wesam,

There is a fault in the V8 scan tool as follows:

By default the SAE PID WO2S11 is defined with a scale of 2/65535 = 3.0518E-5. That is also the scaling for lambda used by the wide band controller.
In later versions of the OBDII protocol, the SAE defined additional scaling options for the wide band PIDs that can be requested by the ECM. The controller that you are logging modified the scaling for the WO2S11 PID. That in turn affected the way the V8 scan tool scaled the lambda data returned by the wide band controller. That data from the wide band controller should not have been scaled as it was not transmitted by the ECM (which was the controller that modified the scaling) but was transmitted by the wide band controller (masquerading as a glow plug module) which did not request any modified scaling.

This issue will only occur when logging ECM controllers that modify the scaling of the PID WO2S11 (which is the PID the wide band controller uses to transmit wide band data).

Unfortunately there is no easy/quick fix for that particular issue. I have updated the V8 scan tool to not modify the scaling of PIDs that originate from the GPM (i.e wide band) even if/when the ECM requests modified scaling for that PID.
That update should be available as a beta release this week or early next week.

Regards
Paul

Paul are you sure it V8 scammer fault ? Ot seems its working well with V2
The scalling problem just when I use the V3

Blacky
February 2nd, 2021, 03:53 PM
Paul are you sure it V8 scammer fault ? Ot seems its working well with V2
The scalling problem just when I use the V3

There are 5 combinations that you can use to log data:


Does it work in pass-thru with V7/V2?
Does it work in pass-thru with V8/V2?
Does it work in pass-thru with V8/V3?
Does it work in BB logging with V2?
Does it work in BB logging with V3?


Also, if you hex-edit the *.pld file and remove the scaling from the meta data then you will see the lambda values correctly.
I.e. look for this in the file that you sent (E38_AEM_0000.pld):

I:~|..INFO=SAEJ1979,MAX_EQR0=0,MAX_O2V0=0,MAX_O2A0 =0,MAX_MAP0=0,MAX_MAF0=0,MAX_EQR1=226,MAX_O2V1=0,M AX_O2A1=64,MAX_MAP1=0,MAX_MAF1=226

Change the red values to 0.
Those red values were somehow obtained by the EFILive software and used to re-scale the WO2 data. I'm not sure how the software got the scaling - I am discussing that with Mike (Dr.Mike) who wrote the firmware for the AEM.

It may be that the V7 software is not confusing the scaling like the V8 software is.

Regards
Paul

Blacky
February 2nd, 2021, 03:55 PM
Paul are you sure it V8 scammer fault ? Ot seems its working well with V2
The scalling problem just when I use the V3

If you can log the E38 and the AEM for a few seconds on the V3, then save a trace file using the option:
Scan Tool-> F3: Scan Options -> F1: Save Trace File
Then send me the *.xalm trace file - it may show me how/why/where the V3 is getting that scaling information.

Regards
Paul

wesam
February 2nd, 2021, 04:38 PM
Email sent

wesam
February 4th, 2021, 12:50 AM
23654
Attached a log with V2 logging Can and serial at the same time in V8
it seems its working well but there is delay

wesam
February 7th, 2021, 09:14 AM
Any update about this ?

Blacky
February 7th, 2021, 09:27 AM
It is fixed in the next beta update which is due out an a couple of days.
Regards
Paul

wesam
February 17th, 2021, 04:48 PM
It is fixed in the next beta update which is due out an a couple of days.
Regards
Paul

Any update ?