PDA

View Full Version : Custom O.S #3 Update for 2003+



GMPX
January 10th, 2007, 02:55 AM
There was a problem identified in the custom O.S#3 for all 2003+ vehicles that was causing the ECT enrichment table to have no effect on final commanded AFR's when cold. This has been fixed and the updated .tun files are available by downoading the zip file shown below.

1 - Download zip file.
2 - Extract into the folder you store your tune files.
3 - Choose the custom O.S to match your exisiting tune (these new ones have a 'c' at the end of the file name).
4 - Full flash PCM.
5 - Calibration only flash the PCM with your existing calibrations.
6 - Alter ECT fuel table as required.

Updated Custom OS file link (5.05Mb) - CLICK HERE (http://efidownload.iqd.co.nz/software/Custom_OS3_2003-2005_Update.zip)

Cheers,
Ross

AGRO
June 20th, 2007, 02:25 PM
There was a problem identified in the custom O.S#3 for all 2003+ vehicles that was causing the ECT enrichment table to have no effect on final commanded AFR's when cold. This has been fixed and the updated .tun files are available by downoading the zip file shown RossRoss, this the exact problem i have, originally had 04140003, then i flashed cos 04140003c, it made no difference, the other problem i have is when i first start the engine (hot or cold) it runs extremely lean, like 22:1 afr! (wideband) while it is running lean the commanded afr is reading 14.63 yet it is still lean, its lean on idle and wot.after a some time the engine is running the actual afr changes back to where it should be,when i first start the engine, the command afr reads about 13.7 then gradually changes to 14.63, (after start enrichment) but still runs severly lean.please help :cry:

Garry
June 21st, 2007, 04:08 AM
Does this problem appear in #5 too?

BlackGMC
January 15th, 2008, 04:53 AM
Is this fix still required for 03+? The thread was started over a year ago, just wondering if it was incorporated into the OS or what?

joecar
January 15th, 2008, 05:02 AM
I do believe the fix is still required for 03+ COS3...

and since there is no 03+ COS5, the problem does not appear in COS5 (I haven't seen this problem in 02020005).

BlackGMC
January 15th, 2008, 05:16 AM
Thanks! So basically I do the same thing I did before but I use this new file instead of the one loaded into the Custom OS folder?

joecar
January 15th, 2008, 05:45 AM
Thanks! So basically I do the same thing I did before but I use this new file instead of the one loaded into the Custom OS folder?That's correct. :cheers:

Chevy366
January 15th, 2008, 05:59 AM
Wait a minute , I asked about this issue many moons ago and was told that the COS files had been updated to reflect the "c" correction .

BlackGMC
January 15th, 2008, 06:27 AM
Wait a minute , I asked about this issue many moons ago and was told that the COS files had been updated to reflect the "c" correction .

Hmmmm, is this correct or is the earlier post????

Chevy366
January 15th, 2008, 06:43 AM
Hmmmm, is this correct or is the earlier post????
Hmmm , would like to know as well , because I did a tune with MAF just to see if there was any difference and re-flashed without the "c" file . :nixweiss:
Would think that this issue is over a year old that it would have been added by now , 7.4 or so !

GMPX , Ross any input .

joecar
January 15th, 2008, 06:59 AM
Wait a minute , I asked about this issue many moons ago and was told that the COS files had been updated to reflect the "c" correction .oh, they were...? I must have forgotten...:doh: I'll search for the relevant post(s).

joecar
January 15th, 2008, 07:05 AM
I can't seem to find the post(s) indicating this... I'll search some more...

Chevy366
January 15th, 2008, 07:33 AM
I looked as well , could not find , but remember I asked the same question but was told they had been added .
We are version 7.5 , would think they were added by now .
Do you think Ross would know ?

Chevy366
January 16th, 2008, 01:27 PM
I can't seem to find the post(s) indicating this... I'll search some more...
Here you go : http://forum.efilive.com/showthread.php?t=5126 :)

joecar
January 16th, 2008, 01:48 PM
Ah, there's the answer: they are included. Thanks tunedbyGM.

hpcubed
March 26th, 2008, 09:32 AM
The 2002 OS 02030003 has the same problem. When I enable semi closed loop, table A0008 has no effect. When in open loop, I can command an overly rich condition to compensate the mismatch in commanded and actual AFR. Can we get a fix for it as well?

Alex99
September 29th, 2008, 02:42 AM
As hpcubed mentioned I seem to have the same problem with the 02030003 COS3. Is there a fix for that version available?