dc_justin
January 19th, 2007, 01:39 PM
Has anybody noticed an increase in the "noise" of the signal on the V2 vs the V1? I only bring this up because after spending a good hour last night calibrating the V2 inputs (based on voltages verified with a voltimeter), the signal from my lc-1 with the V2 seems to be quite a bit dirtier than the signal from the V1. V1 scan was taken 4 days before the V2 scan.
I plan to rip apart my LC1 harness and recheck all connection points and grants, but wanted to throw this out and see if there is something blatantly wrong that I am doing.
BTW, AFR seems very close, if not spot on, as I mapped Bank 1's LC1 AFR to Bank 2's NBO2, and the switch point from rich/lean occurs right at 14.9:1 AFR. Bank 1's trims have always been 1-2% greater than Bank 2...
http://www.marketitright.com/ss/tuning/V1-V2.gif
I can live with this for now, it just means I need MANY more samples at a given load point in order to be certain it's accurate.
Thanks,
Justin
:cheers:
I plan to rip apart my LC1 harness and recheck all connection points and grants, but wanted to throw this out and see if there is something blatantly wrong that I am doing.
BTW, AFR seems very close, if not spot on, as I mapped Bank 1's LC1 AFR to Bank 2's NBO2, and the switch point from rich/lean occurs right at 14.9:1 AFR. Bank 1's trims have always been 1-2% greater than Bank 2...
http://www.marketitright.com/ss/tuning/V1-V2.gif
I can live with this for now, it just means I need MANY more samples at a given load point in order to be certain it's accurate.
Thanks,
Justin
:cheers: