View Full Version : {B2713} ETC Max Position for Idle
bink
May 15th, 2005, 08:37 AM
How does this work?
My ETC is often 8% and sometimes as low as 3+%.
Should I change this value - {B2713} or should I change the effective area table to reflect greater mm2 per step??
{B2713} = 2.8% currently (stock value).
2001 LS6; 239/251, 106, .570"; 90 mm TB.
TIA.
Cheers,
joel
bink
May 16th, 2005, 03:40 AM
Thoughts???
GMPX
May 16th, 2005, 09:49 AM
That value seems very low, most factory cals are up around 20%!!.
Or was that a typo???.
Cheers,
Ross
bink
May 16th, 2005, 12:47 PM
This value is the same in my stock bin, also :
Parameters Value
{B2706} ETC Max Idle Contribution 2.802734 %
{B2713} ETC Max Position for Idle 18.300781 %
{B2717} Minimum Throttle Blade Position 0.253906 %
Maybe GM did know what I was going to Do to IT! :wink:
jfpilla
May 16th, 2005, 01:29 PM
This value is the same in my stock bin, also :
Parameters Value
{B2706} ETC Max Idle Contribution 2.802734 %
{B2713} ETC Max Position for Idle 18.300781 %
{B2717} Minimum Throttle Blade Position 0.253906 %
Maybe GM did know what I was going to Do to IT! :wink:
Joel,
Mine stays around 8. I think thats about right for C5's. Your huge cam likely is trying to stall the car.
You know I can't try the EATable for at least 3 weeks, but it seems to work for people I talk to. It looks like moving 6 places to 90mm is what works. Makes sense. Try it, it can't hurt.
Joe
bink
May 17th, 2005, 10:16 AM
Thanks Joe! :D
I moved my 1st step from 14 to 30 - guess I pushed it too far!! Seemed to improve though. I'll back it up as you suggest.
It's on jackstands again. I won't be playing with my car for awhile. :(
Cheers,
joel
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.