PDA

View Full Version : no longer a cam virgin :)



The Alchemist
June 5th, 2007, 06:42 PM
hey there people, exciting times this week at work as we have installed our first cam upgrade on a VY2 LS1.
The cam installed was a Crow cam number 871275 218/224 0.525 lift 114 lobe centers. We also installed new springs
http://www.crowcams.com.au/templates/Catalogue-Chev-Holden-V8-LS1-Camshafts.shtml

Anyway, not knowing what to expect we got stuck in tuning the VE with ben factor overlays and sorting timing etc etc.
Power went from 220 kw (dyno dynamics) to 238kw with a solid 10% torque increase across the entire RPM range.

Fuel was 98 Octane. Peak torque timing was only 14.5 degrees and peak rpm timing was 17 degrees and that was all it wanted. AFR's 12.7:1.

Now, question for all the non cam virgins out there :
Is this a reasonable or expected gain from such a cam upgrade? Nothing else was changed on the engine except the tuning of course....

ringram
June 5th, 2007, 08:24 PM
That timing is weird dude. Whats the dynamic compression with that cam?
Id have expected at least 20* timing.
What intake and exhaust are you running? If its stock that might explain the timing its probably hardly breathing at all and charge is full of hot exhaust gases. Get a nice OTRACI on there and a full set of headers and catback (or even better lose the cats). You should double your gains and more. I made 290rwkw with a 220/224 cam.

The Alchemist
June 5th, 2007, 09:14 PM
Hi Ringram, howsit goin?
This car already has a full set of Remus headers and twin 2 1/2 inch exhuast and a OTRACI with K&N filter. T/B is standard, manifold is standard.

I see other similar cam packages on the net making 250+ on Dyno dynamics dyno in Aussie and I must say I thought the timing low as well. The car used to like 17 deg at peak torq and 22 deg in the top end before the cam upgrade

But its the net increase of 20 kw which I thought seemed a bit low but hey Its the first one I've done so what would I know :)

I am logging knock retard at present as a guide but also noting the tractive effort during the dyno run.
Could the knock be over sensitive with the cam change? Do any of you detune the knock during tuning?

cheers Mike

johnv
June 5th, 2007, 10:27 PM
Are you tuneing Mafless ?
My 224/224 made 270rwkw with maf and aroung 290 mafless with all the boltons and would take 25 deg timing wot no probs

The Alchemist
June 5th, 2007, 10:51 PM
Hey John, thats wot I wanted to hear :)
its a weird conumdron :)
I am tuning mafless with the OTR intake > MAF long gone mate
Was that with a dyno dynamics dyno ? If not I can't compare the figures fairly.......but the 25 deg has got me interested!
Maybe its false knock? I'm going to zero the knock retard tomorrow and do full throttle loads at fixed rpms and use the delta spark to check tractive effort.
Mike

The Alchemist
June 6th, 2007, 06:43 PM
Well I tried turning knock retard off and nailed it at 3000rpm and funnily enough I wound another 7 degrees into it and the tractive effort went nuts :) > damn the false knock !
Ended up at 20.5 degrees at peak torque with another 3% torque gain BUT the 238kw top end didn't budge even when I gave it 25 degrees. Had the knock ear phones on, it didn't knock, just made no more power. Ended up at 22 degrees at 6000rpm with no change.
There seems to be a restriction from about 5000rpm onwards where the torque just starts to drop away and is unresponsive to timing or fuel changes.
Any ideas what this could be. The engine has headers with 2 1/4 inch out, gutted cats and the HSV twin 2 1/2 inch exhuast, an OTR CAI with K&N, standard T/B & manifold.

Cheers,

Mike

ringram
June 6th, 2007, 07:34 PM
Did you change valve springs? What intake have you got? You could port your stock TB and probably help breathing at the top end. You will need better springs to control higher rpm too.

Torque will drop after 5000rpm anyway. Peak is probably around 4700 with that cam. Try leaning WOT out to 13:1 the US guys say thats the best AFR for max HP. Perhaps a touch richer at PK TQ though, 12.8:1 etc.
And definately port your TB if its a stocky. It shoudl gain you something up top for sure.

Timing sounds better. You can zero Burst Knock Retard, like most of us do. Id keep the normal knock tables in there though. Take a look at some of the various years knock tables, you might be able to slightly detune them. Say a 300kw GTS and an 05 SS Commodore etc.

Dont worry, it takes a while to get the best out of it. My cam install started at 260kw and over a year of messing about with headers, fast90 intake etc, etc I finally arrived at 290kw thats on 97 octane. I should try 99 shell stuff, but its way too expensive here. I already pay near to $3NZ a litre (£1). Higer octane is like £1.20L !!

You can tell if you have an intake restriction if you MAP at key on is more than your MAP under full throttle. (ie) if MAP is 100kpa on ign (no engine running) and only 95kpa at WOT then you should gain another 5% power when you get that missing 5% air into the engine via a better intake or throttle body.

johnv
June 6th, 2007, 08:32 PM
That cam dosent have alot of lift at .525" but I would def expect closer to 250 rwkw out of that combo.

power falling off early sounds like valve float but I see you changed springs!

Ported throttle body may gain 4 or 5 rwkw and improve throttle response (I port them by the way) but there must be a restriction somewhere still.
What sort of headers ?
Not sure the HSV exhaust is doing you any favours either !

GMPX
June 6th, 2007, 08:42 PM
That is the same as my cam (it's a Crow too), mine made about 270RWKW (On a Dyno Dynamics) a few years ago, but it also has had some mild head work too and a Starr TB, but a pretty crap exhaust (but maybe not as bad as a HSV one ;) )
On the street it pulls pretty strong everywhere and makes power all the way to the limit.
PM me your Email address and I'll send you my tune, mid 12 AFR's at WOT all the way, 0 knock on 98 (Mines a auto with 3.73's too).
In the end, if the AFR's are good and that is all the timing it can take then that might be it (assuming the engine is mechanically sound).

Cheers,
Ross

ringram
June 6th, 2007, 10:20 PM
Could be a case of a bit here and there adding up. (ie) Headers+Throttle+Intake Manifold+something else=missing power...
If you advanced the cam on purpose or mistake more than normal, that might also explain it.

The Alchemist
June 7th, 2007, 06:49 AM
Could be a case of a bit here and there adding up. (ie) Headers+Throttle+Intake Manifold+something else=missing power...


I tend to agree, the exhaust has one of those terrible kiss pipes all restricted by volume, replacing the exhaust is my first educated guess I think.
MAP kpa is still going down to 96kpa at 6000rpm which does indicate a restriction here too. it is running one of those OTRCAI from Paul Manuel at Eastern Automotive > John Are they really any good?
The car hauls on the road though and the customer is very happy :)
The tuner, however is still scratching his head....:nixweiss:

Mike

GMPX
June 7th, 2007, 10:03 AM
The car hauls on the road though and the customer is very happy :)
The tuner, however is still scratching his head....:nixweiss:

Mike

I think that is the important part, he is happy. Mine making 270RWKW is not exactly bragging rights for the dyno crowd when some claim to get that from a stock engine :eek: , but, I think the torque is up everywhere that is why it feels good on the street.
I've never had the car out to Calder Park because I refuse to pay $60 and get maybe 2 or 3 runs in, but I am certainly intrigued to know what it would run.

Cheers,
Ross

johnv
June 7th, 2007, 04:01 PM
The OTRCAI you are using is a copy of the Power Torque ones in Aust which has the runs on the board,they do give quick recovery from heat soak and pull nice cool air up there, but the actual surface area of the filter is quite small so will need regular serviceing to mantain optimum flow.

I run a CS Perfomance pod set-up on mine and am pretty happy with it.

I'm with Ross, on the street the extra bottom end punch and torque of a mild cam makes a huge difference over stock, even if the top end numbers aren't overly inspireing

cheers
john

The Alchemist
June 7th, 2007, 06:38 PM
We retuned the knock sensors today and found that by adjusting the background noise settings while using the knock headphones we found a happy medium between false knock and no knock activation when there was actually knock occuring....does that make sense :)
We also set up lean cruise, starting fuel and did the RAFIG process which helped idle immensely. Its almost like a stock car to drive with good behaviour at light throttle and idle etc just heaps more grunt when you stand on it !
Any suggestions on a good exhaust? Customer is keen to upgrade now, had got the bug :)

johnv
June 7th, 2007, 07:02 PM
Re exhaust my pick of readily available systems in NZ would be Pacemaker headers , remove cats and a "Rage" twin 2 1/2" into single 3"- good quality and sound great,nice and quiet in-car, no drone, but sound awsome outside when you get up it;)

Stay away from the coby stuff !

TuneMaster
June 7th, 2007, 08:52 PM
Can you post up the dyno sheet showing Power and AFR, just curious too see. Have you checked through all the torque management settings????

The Alchemist
June 7th, 2007, 10:16 PM
will do that tomorrow hopefully. Torque management all taken care of. No spark retard stuff goin on etc etc .

ringram
June 8th, 2007, 12:54 AM
No bad. Dont use 3", 3.5" at a min. Exhaust tube flows 112cfm per sq inch. You need 2.2cfm per FWHP. Anything less will eat power. Which works out at dual 2.5 or single 3.5 for just over 500fwhp which is your ballpark.

Definately port your throttle, its a 1hr DIY job. I think you might gain 1 or 2 kpa from that. http://www.geocities.com/wilwaxu/throttlebody.html

Work on your manifold kpa first and see how you go. Though exhaust is more likely to hold timing back imo.

johnv
June 8th, 2007, 01:09 PM
Twin 2 1/2 to 3" will be fine at your level,
I have the flow figures for tubeing floating around somewhere and a single 3" flows around the same as twin 2 1/2", 3 1/2" actually flows close to the same as twin 3" tube !

I can do ported throttle bodies for you on an exhange basis or give you some pointers if you want to DIY, just be careful how much you take out as there isn't much meet in some areas, I had to weld my first effort after finding it's limits, but have it well sorted now:cheers:

johnv
June 9th, 2007, 06:16 PM
Found the flow figures-

2 1/2" flows 0.0220 cubic meters/sec
3" " 0.0457 '" " "
3 1/2" " 0.0846 " " "
4" " 0.1444 " " "


Cheers
John

ringram
June 10th, 2007, 03:23 AM
Have a read here and make your own mind up :)

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/enginemasters/articles/hardcore/0505em_exh/index.html

The Alchemist
June 10th, 2007, 04:22 PM
hi people, just a quick question re: the throttle porting.....
The small venturi (slight rise) just before the throttle plate, is that removed completely and blended into the rest of the body housing?

Chevy366
June 10th, 2007, 04:25 PM
Have a read here and make your own mind up :)

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/enginemasters/articles/hardcore/0505em_exh/index.html
Great article , good read . :)

ringram
June 10th, 2007, 08:40 PM
hi people, just a quick question re: the throttle porting.....
The small venturi (slight rise) just before the throttle plate, is that removed completely and blended into the rest of the body housing?

Yes wipe the rise out and blend if possible.

johnv
June 10th, 2007, 11:12 PM
be very careful in that area !

you cannot take it all out without going through the casting and makeing holes, trust me I know from experience.

And be carefull not to touch the area where the blade shuts, I turned a metal plug up to sit in the rear of the throttle body so there was no possibility of damageing that area.

I've done 25 plus of these throttle bodies now and have it down to a tee.

Will post some pic's tomorrow if I get a chance

The Alchemist
June 11th, 2007, 06:48 AM
that would be great John, Thanks. Whats the cost again on exchange?
Mike

johnv
June 11th, 2007, 10:38 AM
OK here are some pic's

http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1465/5369529/10815997/259034268.jpg

outer lip completly gone

http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1465/5369529/10815997/259034265.jpg

Blade is knife edged and polished

http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1465/5369529/10815997/259034245.jpg

throttle stop filed back to give 100% throttle- gotta be carefull not to take to much off as if you go past 100% you will throw error codes
http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1465/5369529/10815997/259034247.jpg

http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL1465/5369529/10815997/259034250.jpg

Notice the weld (repair) here - this is the area to be very careful and coresponds with the internal lip or venturi, you can not remove it all without cutting through. There are several shallow spots around the circumference in this area.

If your really keen you can cut one side of the throttle shaft off as well (done this with my own) but it can make it hard to centre the blade, which can cause it to stick , so I don't generally touch the shaft for others. Doing them for $200 exchange, you keep your sensors and throttle shaft, the cam on the shafts is different between VT,VX and VY so you need to stick with same.

Cheers
John