PDA

View Full Version : Vista Service Pack 1



Chevy366
September 19th, 2007, 03:52 AM
Got to love this one , that is if you use Linux .
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=42426

Cougar281
September 19th, 2007, 04:18 AM
That's funny....

I DID hear talk from a Dell licensing rep that Microsoft is considering ditching Vista due to underwelming sales even though it's being forced on everyone.... No one in the corporate arena has purchased Vista, EVERYONE is demanding/requesting XP. Would be funny if they did.

Garry
September 20th, 2007, 06:15 AM
:lol:

Maggie
September 20th, 2007, 09:36 AM
LOL ...sounds like a cure for Vista woes :)

Code Monkey likes Fritos.

Code Monkey likes Tab & Mountian Dew.

Vista makes Code monkey very, very blue....:frown:

ScarabEpic22
September 20th, 2007, 04:20 PM
I used to hate Vista, but Ultimate x64 is pretty sweet. XP is definitely way faster though, hands down Vista is a huge resources hog. Im still really pissed there isnt a way to connect my V2 to it though b/c its an x64 system, but hopefully we will get something soon.

Cougar281
September 20th, 2007, 11:21 PM
In all honesty, Vista isn't HORRIBLE. It is a pig, but there are some features that I like about it. You can rename a file and not accidentally remove/rename the extension, static IP changes are instant, versus the 30-90 second hang on 2000/XP for the change to apply. There are a few other things that I can't think of right now.

Tre-Cool
September 21st, 2007, 03:27 AM
Guys as the it manager for a freight company here in oz with about 120 M$ based workstations across the country, I would not be surprised at all with the figures on the take up rate of Vista in a corporate environment.

From my point here are a few issues that we have:
Vista will not run a majority of our programs, some programs are telnet\linux and dos based.

Trying to remotely manage, support vista takes twice as long to connect. if it even allows you, and thats after giving full access.

Servers require Specific print drivers for vista clients, some wont install on 2003 server, or we simply cannot get a vista compatible driver and these are for large corporate Multifunction devices.

No group policies available for locking down Vista as tight as xp/2000 clients.

Once a non-it person has to use vista for more then 1 week, they start thinking it's really good. When in fact its a piece of shit.

on the plus side, even Dell still offer the purchase of hardware with XP, you can guess which version of windows will be coming on the next order of pc's.

Chevy366
September 21st, 2007, 04:02 AM
I Beta tested Vista long before the release of Vista , said right then ain't going to touch this OS .
Tre-Cool , I feel for you .

gto_in_nc
September 21st, 2007, 06:22 AM
I've been using Vista for... heck, since Beta 2, I guess. I'm even running it on a 1GHz tablet (yeah, it's rather slow, especially if I open a dozen or two application windows (I've only got 15 open at the minute, but IE has 12 tabs open...))

I have only encountered a couple of pieces of software that we actually use that have a problem with running on top of Vista. A bigger hassle has been driver availability for legacy devices (sometimes XP/2003 drivers will work OK) and with AV support.

I am director of global IT infrastructure for an MS EA shop with over 1,000 user computers spread over 14 countries. I've currently got about half a dozen IT folks using it daily and intend to migrate the bulk of the company to Vista early in '08 (in conjunction with Office '07.)

Plusses & minuses, as with everything. From my perspective, though, the upside outweighs the downside.

Just my two cents - YMMV (and penguins will discount it all anyhow! :D )