queso
October 8th, 2007, 09:55 AM
Based on my reading of other posts, I understand that it "tweaks" the signal so the computer thinks a different amount of air is flowing thru it, thus affecting fueling.
If I DON'T want the "tweak" that it does, would cutting off the resistor make it just a plain truck MAF?
If yes, would a plain 2002 truck MAF table supply the ballpark PCM values for the MAF table in a LQ9 based 408 + FAST 90/90 setup?
The car has a 2002 LS1 PCM, with a stock MAF table...Ideally, I'd like to ballpark the values for motor break-in. Don't want to be dialing in A/F and all that while trying to put a few heat cycles in it and get the rings seated.
The resistor is the one on the left, right?
http://www.elizabethford.net/2002ceta/408/SLP85mmMAF.jpg
If I DON'T want the "tweak" that it does, would cutting off the resistor make it just a plain truck MAF?
If yes, would a plain 2002 truck MAF table supply the ballpark PCM values for the MAF table in a LQ9 based 408 + FAST 90/90 setup?
The car has a 2002 LS1 PCM, with a stock MAF table...Ideally, I'd like to ballpark the values for motor break-in. Don't want to be dialing in A/F and all that while trying to put a few heat cycles in it and get the rings seated.
The resistor is the one on the left, right?
http://www.elizabethford.net/2002ceta/408/SLP85mmMAF.jpg