Yes, that is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsZ06
Although the values described are calibrated values, so they may not always be 4000rpm, 85kPa etc..
Regards
Paul
Printable View
Yes, that is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsZ06
Although the values described are calibrated values, so they may not always be 4000rpm, 85kPa etc..
Regards
Paul
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacky
So that means we have access to change em?
my gears are turning already....
Soon... (as soon as we get the web site back up again).Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirk Diggler
New design web site should be available tomorrow.
Regards
Paul
I'm not sure I understand. Is the ability to edit B0120 going to be added to flashscan or is it only available with a custom tune?Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacky
Sounds like it will be added and editable jsut like the rest of the parameters
So, effectively, we could tell the pcm to not report MAF errors (P0101, P0102, & P0103), zero out the MAF table, and raise B0120 to an insane number to run in SD?
If that's the case, that'd be slicker'n goose poop!
LOL you want to make positively sure that thing isnt being used. LOL
Take a look at the descriptinos in the screenie Paul posted. You will see that if the maf is diabled via any of the MAF DTC's the PCM ignores that value and applies no correction...
Also, re-read the description posted by Chris from HPT.
The "dynamically calculated" airflow (at <4000 rpm) is not a purely MAP based airflow. It is predominantly a MAF based airflow with a correction factor applied by comparing the difference between the sensed airflow (based on MAF) and the calculated airflow (based on MAP, RPM, TPS, IAT, VE table etc).
The correction factor is adjusted/computed only during steady state airflow. During high airflow changes (stomping on or getting off the throttle) the correction factor is not updated - just used to override the skewed MAF readings that occur in high delta airflow conditions.
The *only* time the PCM uses the MAP calculated airflow exclusively is when the MAF has "failed".
Regards
Paul
I don't know. It almost seems pointless at times to even use a MAF except for the occasional sanity check. :bash: