Joe,
Thanks for your investigations. Here is some additional information:
- I can't open the file you sent in your post 37. First I tried to click on the hyperlink and Windows does not associate this file with EFILive Tune. Although, I can open other tunes that are on the forum with no problem. So, I saved the file and moved it to my desired BIN sub-folder/sub-directory and I still can't open it with EFILlive Tune. I manually assigned the file to be opened with Tune, and Tune starts up but it doesn't open the file so that I can look at the B0101 table.
- Now to your question in post 34. I'm trying to use a CALC.VET map, but all the results show a zero (0.00) change is needed (see attached .jpg file). I expected to see a fairly complete VE table that had been calculated based on dynamic airflow that was temperature corrected and this is what confused me. This map is based on SEL BEN and when I look at SEL BEN, it appears to choose from "iff({CALC.CL}, {CALC.LTFTBEN}, {CALC.WO2BEN})". I'm also attaching my calc.pids.txt file and you can see that I made WO2BEN associate with the value from my PLX WB AFR which I've determined has failed and always is reporting stoic (see screenshot in post 31).
- Considering that my WO2BEN and LTFT are both reporting stoic mixtures, that's likely why I getting zeros in the table. However, this brings me to the fundamental questions that I've always had with the CALC.VET method:
If the CALC.VET method relies on fuel trim or wideband data that is predominately controlled by the MAF lookup table to determine the engine fueling at any given time , how can this approach work to get valid values in B0101? I expected this CALC.VET approach to truly calculate data to fill in the B0101 table.
Wouldn't I be better off to just fail the MAF and do a Speed Density tune? Once I've re-enabled the MAF I'd have a reasonably accurate VE Table and MAF table?