And it's educational.
Printable View
no, if education was involved, his science would be better. i'm unsubscribing, some people are beyond help.
Just working with what I've got...
I don't understand how people can be so one sided? Do you honestly believe that increasing a MAF table 20% is more right than decreasing the IFR table? If you want to talk science, I say they're both wrong. I'm not here to argue that and I'm not beyond gone. I just want to see what works, what works consistently, and what can be done to work consistently with a shorter lead time for tuning. That's the supply chain side of me coming out I guess...
Argh!!....I spent all that time reading thru this thread only to find everyone pissed off and stopped discussing this important issue.
great.
:cucumber:
Welcome ItzNota... :cheers:
Welcome to the forum ItsNota.
I only joined this forum about a year ago. If the only fight is over tuning methods (thats going to be infinite), thats a good one. I like it when guys think they are right and go to war. At least the passion for tuning is there.
Its a good place to hang out. Welcome :cheers:
maybe you could try to start a new thread instead of littering a sticky-quality thread tho?