thanks sinister! this is greatly appreciated.
Printable View
thanks sinister! this is greatly appreciated.
Now that's good Schtuff!
Should I keep the MAF after SD or no? That is the question???
Bill
8)
you can keep it or trash it. if you calibrated it in with this map then i would say plug it in and leave it.
My buddy nick williams knows (and I'm sure that you also know) people that do and don;t have the MAF. Nick is running the MAF and his car is awesome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SinisterSS
When I do this I paste and multiply with lables right?
Yup
You will have to change the column from 8000 to Value,ValueQuote:
Originally Posted by MSGHUFF
Attachment 993
I have been fooling with this for a while and once changed table I could Paste and Multilply but it seems to take my AFRs lean (PLX).
Let us know how it works out for you -_-.
In my experience, there's not a direct 1:1 relationship with the MAF and AFR. I usually make partial corrections, which is where Excel does come in handy. That way, I can turn a BEN of 1.05 into 1.025 (50% correction) easily for each frequency. This helps dial things in a little closer and really doesn't take much time at all.
I assume that increasing the value in the MAF table increases the amt of air added?
In that the AutoVE tunes for no MAF when you throw the MAF back in with it's air correction the MAF air should be ~0 given identical conditions.
Kinda hard to imagine.
Bruce
yes - increasing the value in the MAF table effectively tells the PCM there is more air for the respective Hz value read from the MAF. The MAF calibration is a look uptable similar in nature to the VE table.
Have you seen this across the board or down low where the VE and MAF are "blended"?Quote:
Originally Posted by SSpdDmon