at least I finally have answers.
It seems like such a sweet possibility- having the modes and all already there.
Printable View
at least I finally have answers.
It seems like such a sweet possibility- having the modes and all already there.
say I put mode 0 for everything except for EGT high row. That row- say I put mode 1.
could a DSP2 be as simple as fooling the stock EGT sensors into thinking they are too hot and going to different modes? Besides the legalities of making sensor emulators- it seems like it may work?
I like the trucks ability to adjust per altitude though.
But I don't see how this wouldn't work.
Later down the road is there going to be hopes of adding a pid in the scan tool that actually tells the mode being used?
Mmm, I'm not even sure the ECM supports DMA PID's (which is what that would require), they really, really didn't want people fiddling so RAM access for DMA's might be off the cards too. The joys of Bosch folks :bad:
Well, If the "EGT high" idea works, then you would have a semi DSP3 because doesn't the Tow Haul mode use its own set of Torque to fuel, boost tables, ect? Mode 6 correct? So you can have a dedicated tow tune in tow haul, a stock/ street/milage tune for normal driving in mode 0, then trigger your race tune by switching the EGT high and setting that as mode 1? Sure you'd have to have the "big" pulse, but you can adjust the timing tables for each mode and re work your Pedal Position and fuel pressure tables for those modes also.
It seems feasible at least.
is tow haul mode 6? where did you find that?
and what do you mean by "big" pulse?
edit- if you are talking about B0004- the pedal modes are independent of the fuel and injection timing modes.
The idea here would be to manipulate B1250-B1256. But I still don't get those table axis. The y axis is ok- but the x seems strange. Not sure what 1-11 line up with.
You've told me that before- I aim to find out one day LOL. I'll pass it along should it ever work out in my head...
To me- its crazy a table is mapped yet the variables aren't fully understood.
Does that mean efilive bought/acquired the 'definitions' for LML and didn't map them in house? I've always wondered that.