Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Spark timing for optimum fuel economy

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    158

    Default Spark timing for optimum fuel economy

    Has anyone ever taken a look/tested the "optimal timing table" values versus the stock high octane tables (my ride is an '02 LS1, but I assume other gas burners have similar tables) ?

    I see some very light load cells have very high timing values, about what I have read elsewhere optimal timing would be.

    Anyone up for a testing session, or have the low gas prices got everyone disinterested ?

    Also, while you are thinking about it, I am thinking with lean cruise these numbers might even need to go a little higher ?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    197

    Default spark tables

    I am also working on my spark tables. Got a '07 5.3 LMG

    I will post the original and my modified tables later.

    I am still running, logging and changing the values. I started with +5 additional degrees throughout the whole table. I had to reduce some, others were increased by another +2,3,4 deg

    Harald
    If nobody has done it before, somebody has to do it....

    1997 Tahoe 2dr 4WD
    2002 Alfa Romeo Sportswagon 2.0 JTD
    1982 Deutz Intrac 2004A
    2003 friesian Horse " Henry"

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    197

    Default high octan spark tables

    here is my original and the modified high octan spark table.
    If you do some logs don't forget the octan scaler in addition to the KR PID.

    The scaler will tell you whether the ECM is still 100% using the high octan table or not.

    Harald

    My table is still under construction after every testdrive I adjust some areas..
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	spark_6.jpg 
Views:	577 
Size:	348.8 KB 
ID:	4973   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	spark_org_2wd.jpg 
Views:	586 
Size:	345.0 KB 
ID:	4974  
    If nobody has done it before, somebody has to do it....

    1997 Tahoe 2dr 4WD
    2002 Alfa Romeo Sportswagon 2.0 JTD
    1982 Deutz Intrac 2004A
    2003 friesian Horse " Henry"

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Tre-Cool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    939

    Default

    jesus 50+ degrees of timing!!!

    yikes. you probably be better off with keeping timing to around 38~42 degrees and lean off the fuel to about 16:1.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    197

    Default timing

    ...I thought timing is ok as long as there is no knock activity? And just in case the load is too big the ECM starts using the low octan table..which I left untouched..

    The engine loves it and I get better mileage.

    Harald
    If nobody has done it before, somebody has to do it....

    1997 Tahoe 2dr 4WD
    2002 Alfa Romeo Sportswagon 2.0 JTD
    1982 Deutz Intrac 2004A
    2003 friesian Horse " Henry"

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,897

    Default

    The only way to really tune this is on a load dyno.
    "All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing..."

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member macca_779's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Highlander View Post
    The only way to really tune this is on a load dyno.
    I use a technique where with the DVT control move timing around until you find the most vacuum. Obviously this doesn't work for WOT. But part throttle fuel economy tuning, it works great.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    197

    Default spark timing

    Nice ideas, but what if a dyno is out of reach and the only way to adjust the timing is by driving - logging -- adjusting --- driving----

    Imagine this with the narrow German roads, a lifted Tahoe and the Laptop on the center console..... fun stuff..

    Harald
    If nobody has done it before, somebody has to do it....

    1997 Tahoe 2dr 4WD
    2002 Alfa Romeo Sportswagon 2.0 JTD
    1982 Deutz Intrac 2004A
    2003 friesian Horse " Henry"

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,897

    Default

    Max vacuum has always been an option, but you would have to log a SPECIFIC route that you can take with pretty much a lot of accuracy in order to find those max vacuum differences. Otherwise there is no better way than a loaded dyno. I have a dyno and its only inertial and I can apply a "brake" load and its still a pain in the butt doing it via the vacuum way.

    You can also do it by logging the average TPS with the cruise control engaged. There are many different ways. But the best way is just that one.
    "All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing..."

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by harascho View Post
    ...I thought timing is ok as long as there is no knock activity? And just in case the load is too big the ECM starts using the low octan table..which I left untouched..

    The engine loves it and I get better mileage.

    Harald
    How much has it changed your fuel economy? You are running about 10 degrees more spark than I do. What type of fuel are you running?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Thought for better fuel economy?
    By neil in forum Tips and tricks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 17th, 2011, 05:37 PM
  2. Fuel Rail Pressure's relationship to fuel economy.
    By duramaximizer in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: February 28th, 2010, 01:18 PM
  3. C6 Z06 optimum timing & AFR
    By odd boy in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 18th, 2009, 08:29 AM
  4. E38 fuel economy tuning
    By hymey in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 26th, 2009, 12:34 AM
  5. Optimum Spark Tuning for the E40 /LS2
    By Gelf VXR in forum Gen IV V8 Specific
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: May 5th, 2008, 05:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •