Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Spark timing for optimum fuel economy

  1. #11
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    746

    Default

    I'm wondering how to determine what the point of diminishing returns (without a dyno) is with regards to low MAP. I have my table maxxed out at 40 degrees right now, I fear going any farther will be less efficient and make the truck less responsive.
    1998 GMC Sierra K1500 5.7/4L80E, longtubes, 411 w/COS 5, marine cam/intake, Whipple. 91 octane at 6000'.
    1997 GMC Sierra K3500 7.4/4L80E, 411 w/COS 3, Whipple, small cam.
    2004 Corvette Z06 with longtubes.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Unless the dyno has regenerative loading, it won't be the best method as inertial dyno's are only meant for WOT burst.

    Your best bet is a long, flat road in an area with little wind, tune/adjust AFR and spark for lowest fuel use.

    Does that answer your question, or were you looking for something more explicit ?

    My problem is there isn't a straight or flat road in this area for 150 miles. :(

  3. #13
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,897

    Default

    What people need to understand is that NOT always the peak Tq generated by an engine is just before detonation....

    You can have gone WAY past your peak torque and not be near detonation... Same goes with max vacuum. There are so many variables that will affect max vacuum while driving that HONESTLY... it is very difficult...

    What I do is... lick my thumb... put it in the air... and say... hmm.. it feels like i should put xx amount of timing there for max economy... LOL. In other words... experience, bucking, no bucking and a bunch of other factors that will account to what I feel is right... If i had a loaded dyno, it would be DEAD on for that AFR.
    "All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing..."

  4. #14
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    746

    Default

    It is for this reason that I am hesitant to advance my timing more than 40 degrees in the low load areas.
    1998 GMC Sierra K1500 5.7/4L80E, longtubes, 411 w/COS 5, marine cam/intake, Whipple. 91 octane at 6000'.
    1997 GMC Sierra K3500 7.4/4L80E, 411 w/COS 3, Whipple, small cam.
    2004 Corvette Z06 with longtubes.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    158

    Default

    The original question was related to the GM optimal timing table.

  6. #16
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    746

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Extinct View Post
    The original question was related to the GM optimal timing table.
    And their values exceed 40 degrees, so now you see why I'm so torn.
    1998 GMC Sierra K1500 5.7/4L80E, longtubes, 411 w/COS 5, marine cam/intake, Whipple. 91 octane at 6000'.
    1997 GMC Sierra K3500 7.4/4L80E, 411 w/COS 3, Whipple, small cam.
    2004 Corvette Z06 with longtubes.

  7. #17
    Lifetime Member hymey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    313

    Default

    All depends how it feels whilst driving. Better off doing this stuff on the road, not dyno, only a dyno shop will inform you otherwise.

    Watch your knock sensors, ensure your ve is spot on, also air temp changes. I only tune at night normally when IATs are more stable then pull timing with the iat table during the day if any knock occurs. Around 4 degrees from knock is optimum.

    The biggest thing most tuners don't understand is if the engine is tuned correctly peak cylinder pressure occurs ATDC at the same time regardless of rpm and load. Hence if peak pressure occur at 5*ATDC with 22* timing at 5000 rpm then at 2000rpm with high MAP and timing is 40* then peak pressure will occur at the same 5*ATDC. So in this instance if the peak pressure occurs at TDC knock will result and you lose power, retard to far your at 10* ATDC peak pressure and you lose torque. So adjusting your timing up or down at low rpm and watching real knock and pulling away 5 deg timing will get you in the ball park, then if you retard more and g/cyl falls off you have gone to far, but 5 deg away from knock in cool air gets you right in the ball park.

  8. #18
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,897

    Default

    I am sorry hymey...

    What you are trying to accomplish is correct, but your logic is flawed. There is no way of knowing exactly when peak cylinder pressure will occur for a given rpm/map combination without a dyno (unless some other special equipment is used)... I am not saying it because I have one, because my dyno has NO load control and there is no way I can actually tune part throttle like this correctly...

    5º from knock can still be TOO far advanced for a given RPM/MAP combo, specially on the lower cylinder pressure areas... Just as an example.. I have maxed out the idle tables and I have never seen knock at idle, yet... Car was way past it's peak cylinder pressure at those points...

    Often times you do see knock on the onset of peak cylinder pressure, but it's not always the case. That is why you need a dyno to see actual torque output to determine the result...

    By using your logic.. if i see knock at 29º total advance and pull back 5 degrees I have just lost around 9rwhp on an LSx at WOT. Is that good?

    There are only 2 ways of knowing peak cylinder pressures... A special spark plug that WILL measure it or a load dyno. The road is to imperfect (at least here) to actually have a nice reading that will reflect the various scenarios needed to accomplish certain things that can be easily measured on a Dyno, inertial dyno and that is aside from the risk of Pedal to the Metal...
    "All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing..."

  9. #19
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Supercharged111 View Post
    And their values exceed 40 degrees, so now you see why I'm so torn.
    The lower the map usually means there is less cylinder pressure and less torque output as a result. The less cylinder pressure means a slower burn and then you need to advance the timing for it to occur at the point hymey described 5-15º ATDC.
    "All that is needed for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing..."

  10. #20
    Lifetime Member hymey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    313

    Default

    I am very sorry Highlander but you have been mislead

    No you don't advance that far at idle. Idle is combination of airflow and timing. I am not talking idle tuning. I am talking driving conditions. You tune for maximum torque at any given rpm and map for best economy and performance. Tuning LS1s I have always been able to get fueling better on the road then dyno 100% of the time you cant get road conditions on the dyno and if you can you have to compensate for it, and trust me I have 1000s of hours of logging. Ramp rates drastically change and alter fueling to the road by a hole 1 afr point at WOT generally. Best to use both dyno and road. Of course you need time to do this and usually at your own expense as it is faster to do it on the dyno then the road, Hence why so may self tuners can tune there car better then any shop, takes time and logging and temp variation to get it right. Many cars I have done have exceeded over 800km per tank by doing so.

    Also ur statement there is no way knowing peak VE is far beyond the truth. We have efilive and good PCMs, you can log peak g/cyl in the log and it will show you right there and then. This is also backed up on the dyno. A load dyno at that. If to much timing is put in peak VE drops off dramatically. Its about using the tools at hand and having the knowledge and experience to carry it out. Hence why my peak dyno number tune and best ET track tune vary by a long shot.

    I am stating a fact, its correct from a physics and chemistry point of view. And its proven. A dyno can't see this you and I can't. But a well tuned engine will have peak cylinder pressure occuring at the same time. If its to late you lose torque to early you lose torque. When you spark an engine changes as MAP and rpm varies. Maybe the average mechanic cannot comprehend this but its science and we can go much deeper if you like.

    You can argue with me all day, but I listen to doctors in physics. I listen and learn.

    Again argue the point with me. But there are to many variations to look at. Simply my point is peak pressure always occurs at the same time hence at 100kpa at low rpm your engine requires x deg timing at 5000rpm it needs more advance to fire earlier to ensure that peak cylinder pressure is occuring at the correct moment.
    Last edited by hymey; June 7th, 2009 at 03:15 PM.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Thought for better fuel economy?
    By neil in forum Tips and tricks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 17th, 2011, 04:37 PM
  2. Fuel Rail Pressure's relationship to fuel economy.
    By duramaximizer in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: February 28th, 2010, 12:18 PM
  3. C6 Z06 optimum timing & AFR
    By odd boy in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 18th, 2009, 07:29 AM
  4. E38 fuel economy tuning
    By hymey in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 25th, 2009, 11:34 PM
  5. Optimum Spark Tuning for the E40 /LS2
    By Gelf VXR in forum Gen IV V8 Specific
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: May 5th, 2008, 04:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •