Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: first tune please pick apart.

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member smslyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    278

    Default first tune please pick apart.

    Here is my first tune woundering if there is anything i can changed or should change on it?? first run with new tune on.efi
    2001 camaro z28 ss vert with factory slp upgrades, Hooker long tubes, 3"y-pipe to a 4" muffler, ,airlid,s.s.r.a. ,t.c.bypass,descreened m.a.f. 232/234 .595,.598 +2 comp cam with ported and polished stock heads with .650 lift dual springs and a bowl grind. tuned with EFI Live. All combined to achieve 29 m.p.g. and 399 r.w.h.p. with 384 lbs of torque. sold...

    Now own a 2015 1LE camaro

  2. #2
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    From just looking at your log it looks very good.

    No KR, LTFT's are slightly negative, injectors max out ~71% (good).

    My only question would be do you have a wideband?
    Last edited by WeathermanShawn; February 10th, 2010 at 12:29 AM. Reason: Grammer
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


  3. #3
    Lifetime Member smslyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    278

    Default

    I don't have a wideband yet, but it's in the making. No issues at all with this tune. It really woke this car up big time. I am very pleased with it. I still do have the cat protection mode enabled. Would you see this as a problem? Maybe as to why the LTFT are in the -??
    2001 camaro z28 ss vert with factory slp upgrades, Hooker long tubes, 3"y-pipe to a 4" muffler, ,airlid,s.s.r.a. ,t.c.bypass,descreened m.a.f. 232/234 .595,.598 +2 comp cam with ported and polished stock heads with .650 lift dual springs and a bowl grind. tuned with EFI Live. All combined to achieve 29 m.p.g. and 399 r.w.h.p. with 384 lbs of torque. sold...

    Now own a 2015 1LE camaro

  4. #4
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    No, it is O.K. to have your LTFT's in the negative. Overall, thats more favorable for WOT fueling (no extra fuel added).

    As far as COTP enabled, when you get your wideband I would disable it. Under COTP AFR's are ~11.9, way to rich for maximum performance. IMO, as long as you are not doing 3-4 rapid-fire WOT of >15 seconds, your cats will be 'fine'.

    I believe the Commanded Fuel Pid GM AFR does not reflect when COTP is being utilized. Just a F.Y.I., as your log on GM AFR indicates.

    With no KR, and the rest of your tune looking good I seriously doubt you are running lean. The wideband would just give you the confidence of a having the AFR at WOT that you want. Disabling COTP will give you a a even nicer WOT pull.
    Last edited by WeathermanShawn; February 10th, 2010 at 12:28 AM. Reason: Grammer
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


  5. #5
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    We have seem some evidence that COTP does show up sometimes in the commanded AFR... yeah, it confused me... the cats should be fine with COTP disabled unless you're doing extended period WOT pulls.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smslyguy View Post
    Here is my first tune woundering if there is anything i can changed or should change on it?? first run with new tune on.efi
    At 02 sensor readings consistently around 905mv, I ran around 12.7:1 AFR consistently with my stock Z06 and airbox. At slightly above 890mv, I found the car pulled real hard. I settled with around 905-911. At less than 890mv, I found a slightly lean mix.

    Your tune looks good, but I would recommend you consider a slightly richer mix on top.
    07 Silverado DMax Classic
    02 Z06 LS3 416, 805rwhp, TFS245, Wiseco, Callies Crank/Rods, Iskendarian Lifters, Crower Rockers, FAST102/90, ATI Damper, 1-7/8 Kook's LT, QkTime Shield,Tolle-Fab 8pt
    Old Engine: 1/4mile = 9.6/146 New Engine:?

    EFI Live Tune/Scan v7.5.27, EFI Live Scan and Tune v8.2.23, build 276, BootBlock 2.07.06, FirmWare 2.07.52, 512K RoadRunner (12.14.R), Innovate Serial LC2x2


    COS5/12212156 For 2002 Z06 Manual Vette

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member smslyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    278

    Default

    I have noticed now with the temps in the 80's that i do have some kr a lower underload speeds with this tune. but as long as i don't "bog" the motor down and i keep the rpm's up i don't incure any kr. Would you see this as a problem having knock or should i get reduce the timing in the lower rpm's? I have attached another run without cat protection inabled and also at a warmer temp.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    2001 camaro z28 ss vert with factory slp upgrades, Hooker long tubes, 3"y-pipe to a 4" muffler, ,airlid,s.s.r.a. ,t.c.bypass,descreened m.a.f. 232/234 .595,.598 +2 comp cam with ported and polished stock heads with .650 lift dual springs and a bowl grind. tuned with EFI Live. All combined to achieve 29 m.p.g. and 399 r.w.h.p. with 384 lbs of torque. sold...

    Now own a 2015 1LE camaro

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member smslyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFZ_Z06 View Post
    At 02 sensor readings consistently around 905mv, I ran around 12.7:1 AFR consistently with my stock Z06 and airbox. At slightly above 890mv, I found the car pulled real hard. I settled with around 905-911. At less than 890mv, I found a slightly lean mix.

    Your tune looks good, but I would recommend you consider a slightly richer mix on top.
    at what a.f.r would you recomend on top end?
    2001 camaro z28 ss vert with factory slp upgrades, Hooker long tubes, 3"y-pipe to a 4" muffler, ,airlid,s.s.r.a. ,t.c.bypass,descreened m.a.f. 232/234 .595,.598 +2 comp cam with ported and polished stock heads with .650 lift dual springs and a bowl grind. tuned with EFI Live. All combined to achieve 29 m.p.g. and 399 r.w.h.p. with 384 lbs of torque. sold...

    Now own a 2015 1LE camaro

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 5th, 2008, 02:35 PM
  2. Looking to pick up the RoadRunner
    By Whippled 496 in forum RoadRunner Real-Time PCM Emulator
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: April 13th, 2008, 11:18 PM
  3. What else can I tune without scanning or black boxen it? Tune history inside.
    By Round Rock TJ in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 3rd, 2007, 02:27 AM
  4. Convince me to change to a 2bar tune...709rwhp through an EFI maf tune.
    By onfire in forum Forced Induction and Nitrous Oxide (N20)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: June 16th, 2006, 12:04 PM
  5. Will Flash scan pick up Emission failure codes
    By Biodiesel66 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 6th, 2006, 12:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •