Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Auto MAF (the begginning)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    197

    Default Auto MAF (the begginning)

    So I've done my first AutoMAF log. The 2700-3300 range of the MAFFREQ/Ben Map kinda scare me.

    Just to review my process first to make sure I'm doing it right.

    b0120 set to 400 so I'm in PE mode all the time.
    b3801 disabled, no LTFT
    Logged MAFFReq in addition to my other PIDS
    P0101 - p0103 set back to MIL
    DFCO temp set real high to disable

    Opened Log, then opened the B5001-MAF Calibration - LC1 WO2 BEN.map sample file. Change LC1 to my WO2AFR Ben and voila, my map filled in. See pic. I've also included my tun and log.

    So I'm supposed to copy with labels, then paste and multiply with labels over the top of my B5001 right? What about those really high multipliers from 2700-3300?

    What does the MAF Calibration LC1 WO2 AFR map do for you?

    My car ran decent expect idle at stop got down to 500rpm. Makes you worry your gonna die out. That is probably another chapter later though.

    Ken . . .
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AutoMAF.png 
Views:	296 
Size:	52.8 KB 
ID:	5799  
    Attached Files Attached Files
    2001 Corvette Z06

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member mr.prick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    What does the MAF Calibration LC1 WO2 AFR map do for you?
    It does the same thing that the VE WBO2 map did.

    Despite what the the description tab for B5001 says,
    after changing the VE table the MAF will need adjustment and
    an across the board increase is not abnormal.
    If you are going to enable LTFTs and changed B0101 with just WBO2
    then don't waste your time with the MAF and WBO2.
    FYI
    B0120 sets the PCM to use the MAF sensor exclusively for airflow above it's value, not enable PE.
    512k RoadRunner Firmware 12.14R
    FlashScan V2 Bootblock V2.07.04 Firmware V2.07.22 EFILive V7.5.7 (Build 191) V8.2.1 (Build 181)
    LC-1 WBO2

    _________________________________________________

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member 5.7ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,840

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwhiteside View Post
    So I've done my first AutoMAF log. The 2700-3300 range of the MAFFREQ/Ben Map kinda scare me.

    Just to review my process first to make sure I'm doing it right.

    b0120 set to 400 so I'm in PE mode all the time.
    b3801 disabled, no LTFT
    Logged MAFFReq in addition to my other PIDS
    P0101 - p0103 set back to MIL
    DFCO temp set real high to disable

    Opened Log, then opened the B5001-MAF Calibration - LC1 WO2 BEN.map sample file. Change LC1 to my WO2AFR Ben and voila, my map filled in. See pic. I've also included my tun and log.

    So I'm supposed to copy with labels, then paste and multiply with labels over the top of my B5001 right? What about those really high multipliers from 2700-3300?

    What does the MAF Calibration LC1 WO2 AFR map do for you?

    My car ran decent expect idle at stop got down to 500rpm. Makes you worry your gonna die out. That is probably another chapter later though.

    Ken . . .
    Ken, did you set C2901/C2903 back to stock to reenable the maf?
    Edit: just checked your tune & it was set back to stock. Doh

    Also make sure you are filtering out the transients & low throttle positions etc. These are what will be giving you those high values from 2700-3300.
    Last edited by 5.7ute; July 13th, 2009 at 01:58 PM.
    The Tremor at AIR

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    197

    Default

    What would be the filter to get rid of transients, TB > xxx % ?

    I think I have DFCO enabled, set to come on above 86f. Is that right or wrong? I thought I set something to turn it off, but then I see this setting.

    So much to learn, I thought the MAF was PE since it handled everthing over 4k rpm.

    You know why I'm digging this stuff so much? Here it is.

    I've been a programmer for my whole life. Building software and cogs that are challenging, but not nearly as satisfying as when I painted cars on the side. Everytime I handed over a car, it was quick satisfaction that was pinpointed to a brief period of action. Tuning seems to me to be a cross between the two. It's kind of like programming where you have to learn a lot of variables and manipulate them to get the results you want, but the thrill of driving you work, or a buddy driving your work, is like that painted car. The more difficult it is to achieve, the more pride you can take in the results.

    Sorry for the rambling. I really appreciate all you guys helping out the newbies like myself.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member 5.7ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,840

    Default

    I remove any data where TP is less than 1%. DFCO can stay turned on, just make sure you lift your foot straight off the throttle in Decel to allow the filter to remove this data. Slow steady acceleration will help to gather good data as well.
    The Tremor at AIR

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    197

    Default Trying to understand the process

    Bare with me guys. I've been trying to get my mind around what is happening here. See the pic below. I went ahead and hardcoded the huge multipliers to 2, figuring if they need to really go higher, the next few runs will keep making that happen.

    Correct me if I'm wrong here.

    My wideband is reporting that during that ugly red range, I'm really pumping 3,4,5 times 14.67 into the engine (Extremely Lean). So by using the BEN multipliers to tweak my maf settings, I'll be telling (correcting) my MAF that for these ranges you are really pushing a lot more air than you think. AFter I make those changes, the net affect will be ( for the cells I hardcoded to 2x) half as much air, therefore a much richer mixture?

    Oh, and just to make sure, 1500 MAFFREQ represents idle closed throttle and the bottom is full throttle?

    One more thing. The fact that I have went from 78mm throttle body to a 90mm Tb, and also put a fast92 intake manifold should affect my maf how? It thinks the air passing thru it is being handled by the stock intake and a 78mm TB. Could this be why it is so far off?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MAF1.png 
Views:	256 
Size:	36.7 KB 
ID:	5804  
    Last edited by kwhiteside; July 14th, 2009 at 12:19 AM. Reason: mod question added

  7. #7
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    Ken, are you sure those MAF Frequencies you have highlighted are being filtered for DFCO?

    I know you are keeping DFCO on while logging, but those values seem very odd. Just make sure when you filter, you filter out DFCO. You can filter it via throttle %, or better yet, any AFR over ~17.0 or spark advance of less than 10 degrees.

    Your original columns are MAF Hz vs g/s. What are the second column values representing (chart on right)?

    In calibrating my MAF, all my g/s calibrations increase for every Hz. I think it has to work that way.
    Last edited by WeathermanShawn; February 10th, 2010 at 12:03 AM. Reason: Grammer
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WeathermanShawn View Post
    Ken, are you sure those MAF Frequencies you have highlighted are being filtered for DFCO?
    I have the 6% TP Change filter applied

    Quote Originally Posted by WeathermanShawn View Post
    Maybe I missed it, but your original columns are MAF Hz vs g/s. What are the second column values representing (chart on right)?
    The chart in the pic right above this post was using AFR instead of BEN, so when it reads 52, or 58, or 61, that is reported AFR :(

    Now you will understand my concern with those ranges and bumping those numbers up as high as suggested. If you go up to my first post, you will see the suggested multipliers are 3.4 to 4 times. Nobody had chimed in, so I hardcoded to a max multiplier of 2 to be safe.

    Now that I think about your comment of filtering out everything above 18, and reflecting on what happens to my AFR in my logs when I let off the gas, I think those values are from letting off the gas, and are very erroneous. My logs show my AFR going thru the roof every time I push in the clutch and let off the gas.

    Any input would be great.
    2001 Corvette Z06

  9. #9
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    In your transient filter exclude TP less than 1% or 5% (i.e. closed throttle) and when driving/logging take your foot cleanly/smartly off the throttle pedal as 5.7ute said (might be easier if you disable DFCO during tuning since the PCM doesn't provide any real indication of DFCO active).

    You will need to also filter out any AFR's greater than 15.00 say... and if you can log CPP (clutch pedal position, or whatever it's called) then filter out clutch disengagement too.

    Your TB/intake may change MAF flow a little... so your MAF table may need a little adjustment... but only a little... 2x is too much.

    (btw: the VE table is more meaningful when its units are g*K/kPa rather than %, but that's up to your preference).

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member mr.prick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    If DFCO is on turn it off.
    You may need more fuel in the VE table for that MAFFREQ range.
    512k RoadRunner Firmware 12.14R
    FlashScan V2 Bootblock V2.07.04 Firmware V2.07.22 EFILive V7.5.7 (Build 191) V8.2.1 (Build 181)
    LC-1 WBO2

    _________________________________________________

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Auto VE and MAF
    By kistlerjm9 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: April 8th, 2009, 03:20 PM
  2. auto ve for e38?
    By shane in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 28th, 2009, 09:14 AM
  3. auto VE help
    By chevpower in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 15th, 2008, 06:13 PM
  4. Auto VE the way to go?
    By killaz in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 7th, 2006, 08:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •