Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Increased VE, little change in LTFTs?

  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8

    Default Increased VE, little change in LTFTs?

    Sirs,
    I have a '98 TA and have throughly enjoyed tinkering so far!

    I have changed my VE table (increased by 30-40) to try to decrease my LTFTs but they have not reduced substantially (majority below 5.5, a few cells at ~7). See attached. My O2's are running an average at .45, stock tune average was .55 (WOT .85-.90). I am apparently running leaner and my mpg is up a couple of mpg.

    Should I see more of a change in LTFTs?
    Will I hurt anything by running the VE values this high?
    Or should I lower the VE closer to stock and modify other tables?
    Any help is appreciated, thanks!
    Jason
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	modifiedve.jpg 
Views:	240 
Size:	179.0 KB 
ID:	238   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ltft.jpg 
Views:	214 
Size:	119.5 KB 
ID:	239  
    1998 WS6
    JH Headers, Lid, M6
    324 HP, 349 TQ

  2. #2
    EFILive Developer Site Admin Blacky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    9,501

    Default

    Is your MAF sensor still fitted and functioning correctly?
    If so then changing the VE table will have little effect.
    The VE will only control fuel when the MAF is removed or disabled.

    Regards
    Paul
    Before asking for help, please read this.

  3. #3
    New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8

    Default

    My MAF is still connected and functional. I will reset the VE back to stock and start over...

    Can I perform the AutoVE Tuning? The tutorial references 99+ models. I have read on other forums that the 98s do not respond well when the MAF is disconnected... Are there any special consideration when modifying the 98s?

    Has anyone else had much experience tuning their 98s since the latest version was beta released? How have the 98s responded? Is anyone running SD tunes?

    thanks for the response!
    Jason
    1998 WS6
    JH Headers, Lid, M6
    324 HP, 349 TQ

  4. #4
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blacky
    Is your MAF sensor still fitted and functioning correctly?
    If so then changing the VE table will have little effect.
    The VE will only control fuel when the MAF is removed or disabled.

    Regards
    Paul
    I thought the primary VE controlled fueling in close-loop and the secondary or "backup" VE is used when the MAF is disconnected (open loop), at least on the '98's ????
    So if VE has no effect on fueling with the MAF connected, how is the way (what tables) to adjust fueling if you plan on leaving your MAF connected?
    :?:

Similar Threads

  1. Relationship between timing and increased Fuel
    By LBZoom in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: April 22nd, 2009, 04:14 AM
  2. All LTFTs the same!!
    By danf1000 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 3rd, 2008, 01:32 PM
  3. TC locked vs. unlocked... Which for increased mpg?
    By turboberserker in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 17th, 2006, 02:50 PM
  4. Monitoring the LTFTs
    By mtnman in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 19th, 2005, 05:10 AM
  5. The perculiarities of LTFTs
    By daveb in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 9th, 2005, 02:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •