Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 109

Thread: OLSD feels awesome.. issue down low.

  1. #41
    Lifetime Member waterbug1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mr.prick View Post
    If you do change B3605, don't use straight BEN factor.
    Subtract 1.00 until it richens up, you don't need to go too rich for cold start.

    This will lean you out.
    In OLSD you will need more in the VE table for colder ECT and
    as the engine warms up you will need less.

    This is why I use LTFTs.
    When LTFTs are 0% to -5% the VE table will have higher values so
    when in OL AFR will be richer, no lean cold starts.

    Example:
    OLSD @ 200°F ECT & IAT 90°F will need x.xx in VE but
    100°F ECT & 60°F IAT will need more and will progressively need less as
    ECT & IAT get higher.
    Even with ECT at normal/steady operating range,
    IAT will have an impact on fueling.
    High IAT = higher AFR.
    For me over 96°F AFR will start to lean out in OL.
    There are IAT & ECT blending tables but they are scaled by the MAF.


    I didnt change b3605..

    I did add 8% on the main ve on the highlighted part when i looked at the log, it didnt do anything.

    1999 Trans Am. 10.71 @ 126 - stock bottom end-

  2. #42
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    389

    Default

    I think your VE table is not right, all my cars have a nice smooth numbers and your is not. I think you are very lean in your table and are having to make it up elsewhere.

    Do you have a log from start to 180 degrees just sitting and idling? No revs no nothing, just idling. Also, leave your key on for 30 seconds or so for your wideband O2 to warm up prior to starting it.

    Please get me a log from cold to hot at idle.

    230" Dragster - 2000 LS1, 02020003 Speed Density, PRC 2.5 Heads,
    MS3 Cam 237/242 .603/.609, Vic Jr. intake, Holley 1000CFM TB,
    PowerGlide, 5000 stall converter. 8.70@154 MPH

    My Projects Homepage: http://www.horsepowerracing.com

  3. #43
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Also, what cam, heads, injectors and fuel pressure?

    230" Dragster - 2000 LS1, 02020003 Speed Density, PRC 2.5 Heads,
    MS3 Cam 237/242 .603/.609, Vic Jr. intake, Holley 1000CFM TB,
    PowerGlide, 5000 stall converter. 8.70@154 MPH

    My Projects Homepage: http://www.horsepowerracing.com

  4. #44
    Lifetime Member waterbug1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LS1_Dragster View Post
    Also, what cam, heads, injectors and fuel pressure?
    59cc Dart 205's, 234/242 .605 114, FAST 36'ers and fuel pressure is at 60psi...

    1999 Trans Am. 10.71 @ 126 - stock bottom end-

  5. #45
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    389

    Default

    I have a tune from my dragster that's real close, I'm going to make some changes for you and upload. You can try it for shits and giggles.....

    230" Dragster - 2000 LS1, 02020003 Speed Density, PRC 2.5 Heads,
    MS3 Cam 237/242 .603/.609, Vic Jr. intake, Holley 1000CFM TB,
    PowerGlide, 5000 stall converter. 8.70@154 MPH

    My Projects Homepage: http://www.horsepowerracing.com

  6. #46
    Lifetime Member waterbug1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LS1_Dragster View Post
    I think your VE table is not right, all my cars have a nice smooth numbers and your is not. I think you are very lean in your table and are having to make it up elsewhere.

    Do you have a log from start to 180 degrees just sitting and idling? No revs no nothing, just idling. Also, leave your key on for 30 seconds or so for your wideband O2 to warm up prior to starting it.

    Please get me a log from cold to hot at idle.
    here is the log I just ran for ya... The WB02 will just reset when i start it so i get that messed up AF until it starts going..

    not completly a cold start do to earlier tries, but it still surged a little upon the inital start...
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by waterbug1999; August 9th, 2009 at 08:14 AM.

    1999 Trans Am. 10.71 @ 126 - stock bottom end-

  7. #47
    Lifetime Member waterbug1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LS1_Dragster View Post
    I think your VE table is not right, all my cars have a nice smooth numbers and your is not. I think you are very lean in your table and are having to make it up elsewhere.

    Do you have a log from start to 180 degrees just sitting and idling? No revs no nothing, just idling. Also, leave your key on for 30 seconds or so for your wideband O2 to warm up prior to starting it.

    Please get me a log from cold to hot at idle.
    when I went speed density, I logged about an hours worth to get the ve tables more accurate because I yanked the MAF so i did i needed to for the extra air flow...

    Thats the numbers I got so I didnt smooth anything.

    1999 Trans Am. 10.71 @ 126 - stock bottom end-

  8. #48
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    389

    Default

    Try this tune. If your WBO2 is correct you are really lean! I'm sure that it wont be ideal and in fact may be terrible but since our engines are similar and our injectors are identical except I run less pressure it should work somewhat.

    How come you dont upgrade to the CO3??

    Are you still running OLSD or what?
    Attached Files Attached Files

    230" Dragster - 2000 LS1, 02020003 Speed Density, PRC 2.5 Heads,
    MS3 Cam 237/242 .603/.609, Vic Jr. intake, Holley 1000CFM TB,
    PowerGlide, 5000 stall converter. 8.70@154 MPH

    My Projects Homepage: http://www.horsepowerracing.com

  9. #49
    Lifetime Member waterbug1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LS1_Dragster View Post
    Try this tune. If your WBO2 is correct you are really lean! I'm sure that it wont be ideal and in fact may be terrible but since our engines are similar and our injectors are identical except I run less pressure it should work somewhat.

    How come you dont upgrade to the CO3??

    Are you still running OLSD or what?
    yep, I liked it when I was logging in OLSD (for the mainve tables), so I left it the way it is.. Yanked the MAF, changed a few things and it runs better then it ever has.

    1999 Trans Am. 10.71 @ 126 - stock bottom end-

  10. #50
    Lifetime Member waterbug1999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LS1_Dragster View Post
    Try this tune. If your WBO2 is correct you are really lean! I'm sure that it wont be ideal and in fact may be terrible but since our engines are similar and our injectors are identical except I run less pressure it should work somewhat.

    How come you dont upgrade to the CO3??

    Are you still running OLSD or what?
    did you take my tune and tweak it or is this a whole difffernt one that will mess up the trans and everything else?

    1999 Trans Am. 10.71 @ 126 - stock bottom end-

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Car feels sluggish after MAF removal
    By Alex99 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 18th, 2009, 04:36 AM
  2. Code Q for awesome folks that help
    By Gonz in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 13th, 2008, 01:26 PM
  3. Car feels really flat initially
    By Tordne in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: July 26th, 2006, 05:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •