Page 11 of 26 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 258

Thread: using 14.047 for desired AFR and not 14.63?

  1. #101
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    169

    Default

    You would have to leave the Tractor
    Cal Editor aka A.J.
    Lead Calibrator at PCM Calibrators
    ASE Master Certified since 1988 -- ASE L1, F1 & A9
    GM Technician since 1999 -- GM World Class Technician since 2009
    CNG Installer -- CSA Inspector
    A handful of people out there who do have an intimate knowledge of GM Calibrations

  2. #102
    Lifetime Member 98 tigershark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    304

    Default Hey CalEditor

    I saw that you are from Washougal. I like Washougal. I live 45 miles east on the WA side and then up in the mountains.
    I think that Chevy366 thinks that I was making fun of Country folk because of the granola head label you get from fox news about the NW. I don't think he knows how many of us country folk there are in or from the NW.
    BTW there is a somewhat new tuning outfit in Washougal I have heard some Ok things about.
    I run into some of there customers at the races. One guy has a 07 ZO6 that he claims has 630 RWP dynoed by them. Thats around 700 hp+ at the crank on E85. His only improvement are a cold air intake, Headers and a Cam and only E85. LS7 injectors cant handle that not even close. Your earlier post (and link) in this thread exposes the guys that make these types of claims. There is no way the fuel system, pump, injectors especially can support that on E85.
    I do not know if it is the tuning shop or the customers as I have heard good things about the shop. We just do not have very many tuners out here in the NW and you could do very well here. Something to consider! Also allot of us hot rod guys out here have Harleys too.
    Maybe we could get Chevy366 to move out here too!
    Take care in the City,
    98 tigershark
    98 tigershark
    L92/427 w/L76 CC'ed heads n upgraded springs
    4.100 stroke, 4.068 bore w/ 11:1 comp
    Cam, 591 int, 613exhst, 232-246dur@.050, 115*
    LG headers, High flow cats,
    RPM level 5 trans, RPM 3.42 gears, 2800 rpm trq convrt. .
    Special Thanx to Joe and Bruce!

  3. #103
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 98 tigershark View Post

    I run into some of there customers at the races. One guy has a 07 ZO6 that he claims has 630 RWP dynoed by them. Thats around 700 hp+ at the crank on E85.

    His only improvement are a cold air intake, Headers and a Cam and only E85. LS7 injectors cant handle that not even close. Your earlier post (and link) in this thread exposes the guys that make these types of claims. There is no way the fuel system, pump, injectors especially can support that on E85.
    98 tigershark
    I can vouch for that...the standard injectors on an LS7 are hitting the wall at 500HP crank on E85.

  4. #104
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    169

    Default

    I worked for Nutter Racing Engines for a few years before moving to Wisconsin. I have friends in Stevenson, Carson, and White Salmon along with Washougal, Camas, Vancouver, and Portland. Back in the early 90's I did a lot of work for a guy with a orange 70 Road Runner and a 76 T-Bird that was in Carson at the time. I think he is in White Salmon now.

    I need to do the Math on the Theoretic HP for fuel blends. It is all math so it should be very hard to do a spread sheet. E85 or E100 just simply has more BTU's per volume. End of story.
    Cal Editor aka A.J.
    Lead Calibrator at PCM Calibrators
    ASE Master Certified since 1988 -- ASE L1, F1 & A9
    GM Technician since 1999 -- GM World Class Technician since 2009
    CNG Installer -- CSA Inspector
    A handful of people out there who do have an intimate knowledge of GM Calibrations

  5. #105
    Lifetime Member 98 tigershark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    304

    Default

    Correctamoondo!!
    98 tigershark
    L92/427 w/L76 CC'ed heads n upgraded springs
    4.100 stroke, 4.068 bore w/ 11:1 comp
    Cam, 591 int, 613exhst, 232-246dur@.050, 115*
    LG headers, High flow cats,
    RPM level 5 trans, RPM 3.42 gears, 2800 rpm trq convrt. .
    Special Thanx to Joe and Bruce!

  6. #106
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    169

    Default

    These are E85 compatible Delphi injectors
    They look a little different and some flow a ton.
    Cal Editor aka A.J.
    Lead Calibrator at PCM Calibrators
    ASE Master Certified since 1988 -- ASE L1, F1 & A9
    GM Technician since 1999 -- GM World Class Technician since 2009
    CNG Installer -- CSA Inspector
    A handful of people out there who do have an intimate knowledge of GM Calibrations

  7. #107
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CalEditor View Post
    These are E85 compatible Delphi injectors
    They look a little different and some flow a ton.
    Cool. Apart from flow rate, it would be interesting to know whether they do actually use different materials to the regular current injectors.

    I pulled my gas tank yesterday to check on a possible leak and at the same time, as there has been a lot of E85 through the tank, checked for corrosion effects.

    There is bare steel in the tank on the sender bracket. No corrosion. Just normal bare metal. No evidence of any effect in the 8 months running E85 and mixes. The tank should be fine for a long time. Stainless from Rock Valley/DSE.

  8. #108
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gmh308 View Post
    Cool. Apart from flow rate, it would be interesting to know whether they do actually use different materials to the regular current injectors.

    I pulled my gas tank yesterday to check on a possible leak and at the same time, as there has been a lot of E85 through the tank, checked for corrosion effects.

    There is bare steel in the tank on the sender bracket. No corrosion. Just normal bare metal. No evidence of any effect in the 8 months running E85 and mixes. The tank should be fine for a long time. Stainless from Rock Valley/DSE.
    I think engineers are over engineering the fuel systems for that what if situation. I have ran e85 on my s-10 non flex fuel truck with a 4.3l for over a year had no problems what so ever. Truck is still running it today.

  9. #109
    Lifetime Member mr.prick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Did you tune it for E85?
    512k RoadRunner Firmware 12.14R
    FlashScan V2 Bootblock V2.07.04 Firmware V2.07.22 EFILive V7.5.7 (Build 191) V8.2.1 (Build 181)
    LC-1 WBO2

    _________________________________________________

  10. #110
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    126

    Default

    yep did tune the pcm for e85

Page 11 of 26 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. B0720-FRP: actual or desired?
    By killerbee in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: November 11th, 2009, 05:55 AM
  2. Desired Airflow Map, not quite right, help
    By kwhiteside in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: September 8th, 2009, 07:14 AM
  3. Desired Shift Time
    By A6sportsracer in forum 6 speed/8 speed RWD/FWD Transmission Tuning (incl T43, T76, T87)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: June 27th, 2009, 11:45 AM
  4. How does desired boost work?
    By pistonrings in forum Duramax LLY
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 30th, 2009, 04:47 AM
  5. Desired Airflow
    By Thumper in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2008, 02:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •