98 tigershark - I somehow mistaked your engine for his! I thought he had a 427 too that's why I thought the cam wasnt overly large.
Thanks, I love doing resto mods and my wife loves the racing!
98 tigershark - I somehow mistaked your engine for his! I thought he had a 427 too that's why I thought the cam wasnt overly large.
Thanks, I love doing resto mods and my wife loves the racing!
230" Dragster - 2000 LS1, 02020003 Speed Density, PRC 2.5 Heads,
MS3 Cam 237/242 .603/.609, Vic Jr. intake, Holley 1000CFM TB,
PowerGlide, 5000 stall converter. 8.70@154 MPH
My Projects Homepage: http://www.horsepowerracing.com
I can understand as the cars you have done are very very nice and one would have to love it to do that fine of work and it also helps when the wife loves it too.
My cam does have an overly large duration but not lift intk or exhst ( very big compared to stock). I have future plans and this cam fit the geometry of what I am working towards.
I think duration is as important as lift when planning a project.
Also a blank L92 block is the exact same block as the LS3. These LS motors seem to need less cam than the LTs or so it would seem.
Take care,
98 tigershark
98 tigershark
L92/427 w/L76 CC'ed heads n upgraded springs
4.100 stroke, 4.068 bore w/ 11:1 comp
Cam, 591 int, 613exhst, 232-246dur@.050, 115*
LG headers, High flow cats,
RPM level 5 trans, RPM 3.42 gears, 2800 rpm trq convrt. .
Special Thanx to Joe and Bruce!