Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: B1099 vs. C0803-0806 grams/sec conflicts

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member MN C5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    376

    Default B1099 vs. C0803-0806 grams/sec conflicts

    I'm having some issues with tuning MAF'less and was wondering what opinions there were on this topic.

    B1099 shows a gms/sec limit of 2455.2471 at 15,000hz and C0803-0806 show and upper limit of 512 grams/sec.

    So is the MAF still limited to 512 grams/sec as a hard ecm limit? Or does setting P0068 to "X:Not Reported" eliminate the C0803-0806 from the programing loop? Or is there something else affected by the 512 grams/sec limit in the C080X tables. I was hoping to dial in the VE table and hook the MAF back up. Will setting POO68 to not reported be enough to run more that the 512 grams/sec

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member GMPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    13,148

    Default

    What OS? Actually, that doesn't really matter, GM change the limits over time, they are hard coded limits in the ECM, not something we've decided on.
    I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member MN C5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    376

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMPX View Post
    What OS? Actually, that doesn't really matter, GM change the limits over time, they are hard coded limits in the ECM, not something we've decided on.
    Thanks for the reply! I'm trying to understand how tables C0803-06 affect the tune.

    0803 "Used by the ETC diagnostic tests, this table defines the maximum expected measured airflow for a given RPM." So what happens when you exceed the max unit value of 512? Or if thats the expected maximum expected flow what does the PCM do when it sees a value greater than 512. I know GM had a hard limit of 512 on the last gen of OS's but this OS has much higher values at the higher frequencies, just wondering if once the values are larger than 512 if they are ignored or factored into fueling.

  4. #4
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MN C5 View Post
    Thanks for the reply! I'm trying to understand how tables C0803-06 affect the tune.

    0803 "Used by the ETC diagnostic tests, this table defines the maximum expected measured airflow for a given RPM." So what happens when you exceed the max unit value of 512? Or if thats the expected maximum expected flow what does the PCM do when it sees a value greater than 512. I know GM had a hard limit of 512 on the last gen of OS's but this OS has much higher values at the higher frequencies, just wondering if once the values are larger than 512 if they are ignored or factored into fueling.
    I have the same question.

Similar Threads

  1. grams/cyl not matching from tune/ scan tool
    By Dmaxink in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: December 22nd, 2009, 04:20 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: August 27th, 2009, 10:38 AM
  3. DYNCYLAIR_DMA never above 0.50 grams/cyl?
    By S10Wildside in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 7th, 2008, 09:22 AM
  4. Properties display grams per cylinder values are incorrect
    By Gelf VXR in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 19th, 2008, 12:40 AM
  5. Grams/Cylinder question
    By driver456 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 7th, 2006, 11:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •