Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: looking for a couple m.p.g gains.

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member smslyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    278

    Default looking for a couple m.p.g gains.

    I have a completely stock 2000 gmc with a 01 c.o.s. and i average about 14.5 m.p.g. I am looking for anything to help me for a few extra m.p.g. I have turned off cat protection, and tried bumping the timming 15% at cruising speed, but not much luck with any of these. Any suggestions????

    the truck as 120,000 miles and is tuned up as well.
    2001 camaro z28 ss vert with factory slp upgrades, Hooker long tubes, 3"y-pipe to a 4" muffler, ,airlid,s.s.r.a. ,t.c.bypass,descreened m.a.f. 232/234 .595,.598 +2 comp cam with ported and polished stock heads with .650 lift dual springs and a bowl grind. tuned with EFI Live. All combined to achieve 29 m.p.g. and 399 r.w.h.p. with 384 lbs of torque. sold...

    Now own a 2015 1LE camaro

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member LBZoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    452

    Default

    I have heard some mention of changing the 02 switch points...but i'm not really a gas engine tuner, more diesel. But a buddy of mine has a 99 chevy with the 5.3, ext. cab short bed and get's closer to 18-19hwy.


    On his truck we simply adjusted timing across much of the table, and increased the Main VE table to some extent. Our main goal was power production but in the process we managed to enhance the efficiency some as well so it was a win-win for us. I can give you the tune if you'd like to see how I did things. Just PM me
    Peace Through Torque

    Punisher Performance DSP5 Tuning, PPE Dual CP3's, 68mm Fleece Cheetah, Punisher Built trans w/ Suncoast Parts, Airdog 165, SoCal 100% Overs, ARP Studs

    2013 NHRDA Sportsman World Champion

    www.PunisherPerformance.com

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member smslyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LBZoom View Post
    I have heard some mention of changing the 02 switch points...but i'm not really a gas engine tuner, more diesel. But a buddy of mine has a 99 chevy with the 5.3, ext. cab short bed and get's closer to 18-19hwy.


    On his truck we simply adjusted timing across much of the table, and increased the Main VE table to some extent. Our main goal was power production but in the process we managed to enhance the efficiency some as well so it was a win-win for us. I can give you the tune if you'd like to see how I did things. Just PM me
    yes could you plese? that would be a huge saver for me and i would greatly appreciate that.

    I have tried adjusting the switch points with not much luck, but if i had a tune like your buddy's it would deffently be a great start.
    2001 camaro z28 ss vert with factory slp upgrades, Hooker long tubes, 3"y-pipe to a 4" muffler, ,airlid,s.s.r.a. ,t.c.bypass,descreened m.a.f. 232/234 .595,.598 +2 comp cam with ported and polished stock heads with .650 lift dual springs and a bowl grind. tuned with EFI Live. All combined to achieve 29 m.p.g. and 399 r.w.h.p. with 384 lbs of torque. sold...

    Now own a 2015 1LE camaro

  4. #4
    Senior Member whackem04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    116

    Default

    if you change AFR to say 15.02 would this help in mileage and have the PE take care of the power?
    01 GMC Sierra 1500 SLE 5.3 cam swap
    Tuned by ME (COS 5 - running strong and smooth)

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member GAMEOVER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,304

    Default

    I have my AFR set to 15.6-15.9:1 on the highway and I get pretty good gas mileage. I just have to flash in my Highway tune and keep an eye on the WBO2...
    I actually get better gas mileage with AFM or 4 Cylinder mode shut-off
    2008 2WD Ext.Cab Silverado 1500 6.0 V-MAX E38(L76) & T42(4L70E) MAF Only CL Corvette Servo AFE CAI INNOVATIVE LM-2 WBO2

    FLASHSCAN V2 & AUTOCAL

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member smslyguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whackem04 View Post
    if you change AFR to say 15.02 would this help in mileage and have the PE take care of the power?
    Ya i have ran 15.52 a.f.r as well and did notice a little gain, but didn't run it that long cause i didn't have a w.b.
    2001 camaro z28 ss vert with factory slp upgrades, Hooker long tubes, 3"y-pipe to a 4" muffler, ,airlid,s.s.r.a. ,t.c.bypass,descreened m.a.f. 232/234 .595,.598 +2 comp cam with ported and polished stock heads with .650 lift dual springs and a bowl grind. tuned with EFI Live. All combined to achieve 29 m.p.g. and 399 r.w.h.p. with 384 lbs of torque. sold...

    Now own a 2015 1LE camaro

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Mr. P.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    259

    Default

    I had a very happy economy result this last time out driving the truck - 2003 Silverado SS AWD with shorter tires (30") and turning a Paxton blower, my average combined mileage before installing the Paxton was high 13's; last night I drove 1-hr from Plano through Dallas to Arlington, heavy freeway rush hour traffic 45-80 mph and lots of left-lane squatters and cussing and road rage. When I looked at the DIC I had averaged 15.9 WOO-HOO!!! At 65-mph (2100-rpm) the mileage was 17. The truck has never had that kind of economy even when brand new box stock. I am running COS3 OLSD with DFCO and PE disabled, the VE table is nailed up to 2800-RPM +- 1.25% error, and my commanded EQR in "cruise" cells is .92 and .95. My advice is to log the truck on a combined city/hwy daily-driven commuter trip, and use the BEN MAP counts to determine which cells get "driven in" the most, make your AFR 16:1 in those cells (EQR = .92), and in the VE table cells immediately surrounding those set AFR to 15.5:1. Verify the AFR with either road or dyno logging on the STOCK timing curve, the truck timing curve is very tame and did not detonate on my truck even with the blower, and once you have the AFR behaving like you want then go ahead and map out MBT optimized timing using a dyno and TA-DA you're in business! On my truck (5500-lbs) I found that even on the freeway it is not uncommon to be in the 70kpa area of the VE table, so don't richen the AFR until 75kpa and then ramp in your fuel until you have 12.2:1 to 12.4:1 at WOT.

    Mr. P.

    One other thing - the tune I describe in my truck now is not 'lame' at all, the truck runs like a f'n animal, very crisp and IMO is the best it has ever run. Also, in AFR tuning minute changes matter, my main VE table was +- 3-4% error on the wideband and I was getting 12-13 MPG, this last time I now have that error between 0.75 and 1.5% margin, many of the cells in fact changed less than 1/2% one way or the other) and the economy instantly jumped to high 15s. And in my experience, using the process outlined in the AutoVE tutorial you will have to drive the vehicle weeks until the VE table 'settles in' mathematically to that degree of precision (due to wideband delay and the problem of interpolation between cells) - there is a better way, you have to sit down and really examine the logs and make a spreadsheet of your own BEN corrections. You also have to offset (advance) the wideband data feed one frame to better line up with the commanded AFR IMO.

    My $0.02.
    Last edited by Mr. P.; January 12th, 2010 at 08:03 PM.

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member Mr. P.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    259

    Default

    ONE OTHER VERY IMPORTANT THING -

    3 weekends ago, helped a friend with his 2003 Silverado SS AWD with about the same mileage as the OP's truck (115K-miles) and got surprising result:

    He had a cam installed this last summer, and being broke did not have the money to install a new timing chain; at that time he installed the cam & springs & push rods, the motor ran pretty strong and was mail-order tuned with EFILive by Justin Gadberry and that truck had an average high-13's MPG economy since, and my friend was fine with that as it was "a heavy-ass truck with a cam" and most get about that level of economy (13.5 - 14.0 MPG).

    Fast forward to 3-weeks ago: my friend had $100 and we bought a stock LS2 timing chain and cam sprocket, tore the front of the motor apart and replace the original 115K-mile timing set pieces. Now I knew the original timing chain had stretched, they all do, but the reason that we replaced the chain was for the improved strength of the LS2 chain. The surprise was that after we had the motor together the idle vacuum improved 2-inches (!) the truck ran remarkably better at idle -and- off-idle -and- cruise, and the average combined mileage instantly shot from mid-13s to mid-15s. No lie, no joke, no exaggeration. I was stunned, I had no idea cam timing being off a few degrees would have that drastic an effect on economy; this might also be a case where the factory cam is more tolerant of a slack chain and not loose as much economy as a retarded aftermarket cam, but still if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes I would have thought it an exaggeration - 2.0 MPG improvement with a $100 outlay in parts.

    After seeing this, makes me weep for the mod motor guys and their 6-feet in timing chains!

    Mr. P.
    Last edited by Mr. P.; January 12th, 2010 at 08:06 PM.

  9. #9
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Yes, the cam should be where it belongs, inside the block, a short distance above the crank...

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member Chevy366's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,603

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. P. View Post
    My advice is to log the truck on a combined city/hwy daily-driven commuter trip, and use the BEN MAP counts to determine which cells get "driven in" the most, make your AFR 16:1 in those cells (EQR = .92), and in the VE table cells immediately surrounding those set AFR to 15.5:1.

    Mr. P.
    Good points Steve .
    You will find that the cells are very small in area that this happens in , been there done that , wore the T-shirt out . Look at a Holden tune and Lean Cruise , you will see that the area is just a few cells .
    By nature OLSD is not mileage friendly , but with the COS that can be fixed .
    2005 1500 HD , Custom OS3 SD tune .
    2006 Trailblazer
    Dinosaurs and Plants gave their lives so that we may drive , long live fossil fuel .

Similar Threads

  1. Couple of LMM Questions
    By Cougar281 in forum Diesel
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 26th, 2009, 05:42 PM
  2. Couple little questions
    By samdweezel05 in forum Duramax LB7
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 22nd, 2008, 04:25 AM
  3. A couple of Q's...AutoVE etc...
    By hquick in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: December 15th, 2007, 01:12 PM
  4. Tuning with VE... I've got a couple of ?'s
    By MN C5 in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 1st, 2007, 01:28 PM
  5. is it a couple of days yet?
    By limited cv8r in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: July 2nd, 2007, 06:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •