Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: 3 Bar MAP sensor doesn't work with 3 Bar scaling!

  1. #11
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Whats the voltage out of the map sensor at key on? May be a problem there.
    \"You Can Never Have Enough Horsepower\"

  2. #12
    Lifetime Member GMPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    13,148

    Default

    Howard,

    Does this match what you see.....this is from the 3bar sensor I have here # 16040749.

    Measured voltage at the MAP sensor, engine not running = 1.54V
    Here's the comparison between what the scaler is set to {C6301} and what the MAP value in the scan tool is showing....

    94.4 = 39kPa
    180 = 68kPa
    288 = 99kPa

    Cheers,
    Ross
    I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.

  3. #13

    Default

    Ross,

    I am going to check out these voltage readings tomorrow. I have a fluke meter hanging out of the back of the MAP sensor harness to pickup the readings. It seemed correct everytime we made a MAP or scaling change. IK was just wondering why it never matched the FS's voltage PID.

    One of the posts stated something about creating a new PID to read the raw voltage. How do you do that and has is that different then the current PID that is show in the selectable list?

    Finally, is it possible that the way the custom OS is designed that some PIDS don't work as normal??

    Thanks for the continuing help!

    Howard

    www.redline-motorsports.net

    1-954-703-5560

    2006 ZO6 895/866 with APS TT
    2010 SSRS Camaro HTR-900TT (798/801)
    2011 HTR-850R Camaro
    2012 ZL1 Auto (10.33@135 MPH) Video Here!

  4. #14
    Lifetime Member GMPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    13,148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redline Motorsports
    Ross,

    I am going to check out these voltage readings tomorrow. I have a fluke meter hanging out of the back of the MAP sensor harness to pickup the readings. It seemed correct everytime we made a MAP or scaling change. IK was just wondering why it never matched the FS's voltage PID.

    One of the posts stated something about creating a new PID to read the raw voltage. How do you do that and has is that different then the current PID that is show in the selectable list?

    Finally, is it possible that the way the custom OS is designed that some PIDS don't work as normal??

    Thanks for the continuing help!

    Howard
    Hi Howard,

    Between the email's and forum posts I get so confused sometimes
    Anyway, for others reading this thread one way to confirm what MAP sensor you have is to read the voltage (with a voltmeter) at the terminals of the sensor with the key on, engine not running.
    A 1 bar will read about 4.8V or there abouts (depends on alt as well).
    A 3 bar will be about 1.5V and a 2bar somewhere in between.
    But remember, the PCM MAP scaling calibration will have no effect at all on what a multimeter reads at the MAP terminals.

    The voltage PID's were changed in the scantool not long ago, Paul has said they were causing an issue with black box logging (feel free to chime in Paul).

    No problem with the help Howard and big thanks to Jesse too, I hope after all this we have all learn something to help in the future.

    Cheers,
    Ross
    I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.

  5. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Did the MAP sensor offset (c6302) somehow get changed.

    I have a 2bar sensor in my car and the scaler is set to 190.

  6. #16

    Default

    Here is where I stil stand with this issue;

    3 Bar Map sensor part # 12223861

    Key on (no start) 1.579 volts

    2 Bar Map sensor part # 16254539

    Key on (no start) 2.290 volts w/scaler set to 194


    The Flashscan with the 3 Bar Map reads .830 volts at 55 KPA
    The Flashacan with the 2 Bar Map reads 1.030 volts at 51 KPA

    The only way the car runs clean is when the scaling is set to 94. This is regardless of which MAP sensor is used. As soon as I scale the MAP to the rerquired values (194 for 2 Bar) and (288 for 3 Bar) that car runs worse. Actually when the scale is set to 288 it runs the worse and as you go to 194 and eventually back to 94 it runs noticably better.

    The Flashcan kpa readings also match my kpa readings off my dynos 5 bar map.

    WTF is the problem??

    Howard

    www.redline-motorsports.net

    1-954-703-5560

    2006 ZO6 895/866 with APS TT
    2010 SSRS Camaro HTR-900TT (798/801)
    2011 HTR-850R Camaro
    2012 ZL1 Auto (10.33@135 MPH) Video Here!

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    196

    Default Missing Info in AutoVE Tutorial

    Howard, I would be very much obliged if you could outline what is missing from the AutoVE tutorial as I'm sure others would also benefit from what you've learnt.



  8. #18

    Default

    Here are a few more things I checked;

    2 Bar Map scaled to 194

    Dyno map reading was 62 KPA and the Flashscan read 114 KPA

    Same Map scaled to 125

    Dyno map reading was 60 KPA and the Flashscan read 80 KPA

    Same Map scaled at 94

    Dyno and Flashscan read the same.


    www.redline-motorsports.net

    1-954-703-5560

    2006 ZO6 895/866 with APS TT
    2010 SSRS Camaro HTR-900TT (798/801)
    2011 HTR-850R Camaro
    2012 ZL1 Auto (10.33@135 MPH) Video Here!

  9. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Redline Motorsports
    Here are a few more things I checked;

    2 Bar Map scaled to 194

    Dyno map reading was 62 KPA and the Flashscan read 114 KPA

    Same Map scaled to 125

    Dyno map reading was 60 KPA and the Flashscan read 80 KPA

    Same Map scaled at 94

    Dyno and Flashscan read the same.

    This may be a stupid question. But are you 100% sure you wired the new sensor into the correct wires/connector.

    Also, what does c6302 read in your file.

  10. #20

    Default

    Not a stupid question. but....I did check it. This was backed up by the volt meter readings that I monitered with a volt meter. Ground, +5 volts, and voltage output!

    The {6302} MAP Sensor Offset is set to 10.

    For whatever its worth its COS # 02040003.

    Howard

    www.redline-motorsports.net

    1-954-703-5560

    2006 ZO6 895/866 with APS TT
    2010 SSRS Camaro HTR-900TT (798/801)
    2011 HTR-850R Camaro
    2012 ZL1 Auto (10.33@135 MPH) Video Here!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. ZR1 Map sensor scaling
    By 9secVette in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: October 10th, 2010, 04:49 PM
  2. Scan doesn't work after upgrade
    By ChucksZ06 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 2nd, 2009, 03:11 PM
  3. LC-1 doesn't work pass though
    By samh_08 in forum FlashScan V2
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 19th, 2009, 08:53 AM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: April 14th, 2007, 07:46 AM
  5. Why doesn't SAE.MAP not work? (2-bar)
    By Alvin in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 27th, 2006, 06:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •