Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: AutoVE SD OLFA table HP vs EFI

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    88

    Default AutoVE SD OLFA table HP vs EFI

    I see where some of the tutorial for HP Tuners are setting the OLFA table to EQ of 1.00 in all cells or maybe all cell over 140F. Along with that they flat line the PE to around 1.15EQ.

    Is that method just newer and is there any advantage to it?
    97 Vette 6spd, CamMotion Titan2 LS1 cam, TSP 5.3 StageII heads, Vararam intake, Z06 manifold, ARH headers/cats, Z06 catback, Monster Stage2 clutch, 04 Z06 pcv, new style knock sensor(late98 to 04).

    Using FlashScan V1 with NGK-AFX Wide band

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member mr.prick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    That's the method.
    Set the open loop commanded fuel to 1.00 (stoich) and PE to whatever is appropriate for your application (NA or FI).

    The open loop commanded fuel can have different values in the low ECT areas to avoid lean cold starts.
    For cold start use the Lambda value from the WBO2 as a multiplier for the loop commanded fuel table low ECT areas.
    This will keep the target AFR @ stoich until the engine warms up.
    512k RoadRunner Firmware 12.14R
    FlashScan V2 Bootblock V2.07.04 Firmware V2.07.22 EFILive V7.5.7 (Build 191) V8.2.1 (Build 181)
    LC-1 WBO2

    _________________________________________________

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    88

    Default

    With all of B3605 set to EQ=1, a filter of GM.EQIVRATIO=1 should take out data in the PE range. Filter with GM.EQUIVRATIO>1 would show PE data only.
    97 Vette 6spd, CamMotion Titan2 LS1 cam, TSP 5.3 StageII heads, Vararam intake, Z06 manifold, ARH headers/cats, Z06 catback, Monster Stage2 clutch, 04 Z06 pcv, new style knock sensor(late98 to 04).

    Using FlashScan V1 with NGK-AFX Wide band

  4. #4
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    In some cases, one of the situations that a person may be wanting to avoid is the transition from OLFA 1.00 EQR to PE 1.15 EQR.

    Setting OLFA to 1.00 and PE to 1.15 does make it easy to filter PE or non-PE as you have observed.

    But, either way, the EQR transition would coincide with the throttle transition, so the transition itself can be filtered out with the throttle transient filter;

    [ you don't really care which of OLFA or PE the EQR comes from, the EQR is orthogonal/irrelevant to airmass ]

    and more importantly is to avoid going lean at high load.

Similar Threads

  1. One More Time: PE VS OLFA Commanded AFR
    By WeathermanShawn in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: June 19th, 2010, 04:40 AM
  2. Touching up VE table using BEN/AutoVE
    By Dopey in forum Tutorials
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 21st, 2008, 03:32 PM
  3. OLFA table vs. Custom OS A0008 table
    By 1bar in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 6th, 2007, 06:25 AM
  4. SD.....Use PE or all in OLFA?
    By John02SS in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: August 1st, 2006, 06:39 AM
  5. PE & OLFA (pid)
    By Ed Blown Vert in forum General
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 20th, 2006, 03:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •