Well, for some reason this map is kickin my butt. I have it set to % in the parameter. I made sure tune is % and all I get are 0.00 for data from the log. If I change the tune tool to read in kpa, I get data, but not if I have everything set to %. I will attach the last log and tune. Something doesnt seem right.
Hell, dont know why, but i opened it up on here and then again in my log and it worked just fine. Table looks not that good when pasted. I just love computers. That has been my biggest hurdle to deal with.
Len.
Did you apply the SELBENS from your last log?
Looks like they are still reading .90. If you pasted and multiplied with labels, all the values should have been near 1.00
I just ran your CALC.VE Map with the strict Filter. Looks pretty good to me...
Zero's mean your displacement was not set (or saved) in the log file. Your other computer probably has it set-up properly..Originally Posted by rpmauto
I didnt apply the selbens to the tune. that I posted. I did after I got things working properly. The ve table looks pretty good after a little smoothing. I am using the strict filter that you have in the tutorial. Gonna storm here soon, so I wont be able to log again today and see what things are at. On the log I posted the Trims were still pretty negative though. I did compare it to last years tune with the 98 pcm and the values are getting very close to the same. I am very impressed with only 2 sessions going from a basically stock tune for a ls1 on my 402.
Yes, you are making great progress. You'll have that Tune nailed down real soon.
Watch out for those storms!
This thread shows application of Shawn's CALC.VET Tutorial (starting from post #26), it works out very good:
showthread.php?15813-Noob-needs-help-with-Roadrunner
it shows wideband AFR being read via the PCM's EGR port, and includes a calc_pids.txt file showing show the WO2BEN pid was modified to do this.
Last edited by joecar; April 13th, 2011 at 03:17 AM.
got another quick log in tonite, it is getting real close at cruise, trims look real good. WOT air fuel is still pretty fat. But I dont think it will take too much to nail that down. I did on this last log get to do a bit of wot. I am very impressed with how good it comes around.
I did get some high areas in the ve after this log, even with the tight filter. (95kpa 4400 rpm to 6800 rpm) I smoothed them out a bit and blended the area around them. The values are not quite as high as my 98 tune in those areas. (havent done alot of wot, just this log)
How will the VE being off in the upper range affect the maf calibration. I dont want fine tune the maf, and mask a ve issue, (if in another log or two it doesnt change much.) The selbens seemed pretty close this go round. It did lean them up a bit.
Len, to me this looks like a very good Log. You can't get your SELBENS a whole lot better..1-3% at most. If you ever want to double-check the VE Table without MAF input..just fail the MAF and do a couple of CLSD runs. IMO, not necessary with this log. It looks that good.
I think you are pretty much there. Blending the VE table was probably a good idea, but your MAF, Trims, PE, and VE Values all look legitimate to me..
Shawn,
Yes I think things look real good. I am very impressed with how quick it is. (got the car tuned before my new bow.) The selbens are right on, they did lower the maf table some after the last log. The air fuel in the upper end is still rich though even though the selbens are good. My log shows in the upper end of the maf HZ it is around 11.7 or so. I will try and make another log tonite before it cools down big time round here and see what the changes did for the afr. I am kinda thinking that for just the upper end of the table that getting the air fuel spot on might be better done by using the formula I posted a few pages ago for commanded vs. actual. That has worked very well for me in the past. I will let you know how it goes. (then I can start on the idle, havent done anything with that yet.)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote