Page 38 of 75 FirstFirst ... 28363738394048 ... LastLast
Results 371 to 380 of 743

Thread: Calc.VET: correcting MAF and calculating VE (in single log)

  1. #371
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Okay, I've been slowly getting this set up to tune my car. However, once I select all of my PID's I have one that isn't valid.

    BEN selected from WB or LTFT {CALC.SELBEN}

    Expression:
    factor = iff({CALC.PE}, {CALC.WO2BEN}, {CALC.LTFTBEN})
    is NOT valid because:
    Unknown parameter {CALC.PE}, at position 14.

    PID value cannot be determined because
    the following error would occur:
    Expression not valid: Unknown parameter {CALC.PE}, at position 14.

    Any idea on how to fix this?

  2. #372
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Hi devlmaycry,

    In post #1, the calc_pids.txt file has been updated (CALC.PE has been renamed CALC.CL), so download it and copy to the User Configuration folder.

    Then, when a pid is not valid and it lists other pids as being unknown, then those pids also need to be selected, and so on for those pids;
    for example, you show CALC.SELBEN being invalid because CALC.PE is invalid; so goto CALC.PE and select it; if CALC.PE fails to be valid, then repeat the process on it (see which dependendt pids it sees as invalid and select those also).


    (note that in the updated calc_pids.txt file, CALC.PE has now been renamed to CALC.CL)

  3. #373
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Ok, changed the one PE reference in that txt file and it fixed the issue. I had been in that file before changing the wideband formula since I have a V1, but didn't think to reference back to that file for that PE issue. Thanks again for all the help!

  4. #374
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Cool you're welcome.

  5. #375
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Ok, I'm sure I am just missing something small but when I log it just shows 0.0 in the chart for the blocks it's hitting. On my tune I see in the top right that the VE units are % so I chose % when setting my map up. I also have one set up as kpa, and it shows the log values in the chart as 1.1 etc. So, like I said I'm sure it's something small that I have overlooked, but I can't seem to figure it out.

  6. #376
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    When VE % shows up as zero, then the displacement has not been entered...


    A. Set Displacement: open a Log File, go Edit->Log File Information->Vehicle Options, and next to Engine enter the displacement in cc, click Ok, and save the log file. This matters only if you're planning to use [%] units for VE.


  7. #377
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    27

    Default

    I had a few other things selected in there. I cleared all the fields and selected only the 6.0 in there and it populated correctly.

  8. #378
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Here is an alternate calc_pids.txt file that separates DAT out as a separate pid: calc_pids.txt

    This file has pids for both the Calc.VET and Calc.MAFT tutorials.
    Last edited by joecar; February 13th, 2012 at 04:18 PM.

  9. #379
    Lifetime Member Gregs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Hey guys, currently i'm still using the old Auto.x because I get stuck in my ways sometimes I'm working on prepping to do Calc.x tune and I just want to clear some things up.

    From what i gleaned it appears that the Calc.ve method, correct me if i'm wrong:
    1. you run an all maf tune
    2. the ben corrects maf
    3. the method calculates the ve table
    4. if 2&3 above are correct then why is there a Calc.maf?

    03 Silverado 5.3 ECSB 4x4 Z71
    Comp Cam 206/212 .515/.522 112 lSA, hardened rods with LS9 springs

    2010 Tahoe VVT AFM 5.3
    Stock for now

  10. #380
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    The Calc.MAF procedure is the opposite/reverse of the Calc.VET...

    Calc.VET = corrects MAF and calculates VE
    Calc.MAFT = corrects VE and calculates MAF

    [ the hint is in the name of the procedure, Calc.VET or Calc.MAFT ]

    Also, either procedure can be tailored to use wideband only (i.e. becoming like AutoVE and AutoMAF, but with the bonus of calculating the other table).

Page 38 of 75 FirstFirst ... 28363738394048 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Please explain table A0007 TPS VE TABLE cos5
    By WHYTRYZ06 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 06:26 PM
  2. OLFA table vs. Custom OS A0008 table
    By 1bar in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 6th, 2007, 06:25 AM
  3. Table Names vs Table Number
    By lplott in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 17th, 2006, 05:14 AM
  4. Main VE Table ?, Logged data vs VE Table
    By dbaxter_ss in forum Tips and tricks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 26th, 2004, 03:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •