Page 63 of 75 FirstFirst ... 1353616263646573 ... LastLast
Results 621 to 630 of 743

Thread: Calc.VET: correcting MAF and calculating VE (in single log)

  1. #621
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Is your IFR table correct for the injectors...?

    You said FPR is un-referenced, right...?

    Measure rail pressure (in psi) at idle, and observe pressure as you snap throttle open and then shut... what did rail pressure do...?

  2. #622
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    You haven't applied the transient filter... but I don't think that's the problem.

    How is the MAF table coming out, post a pic of it.
    I added in the filters and the changes were minimal.

    Pic of MAF MAP:


    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    You show two maps:
    1. VET [g*K/kPa] x MAP x RPM,
    2. LTFTBEN [%] x MAP x RPM,

    are you calculating the VE or are you correcting it...?
    I was trying to show that the correction shows to add between 5-10% to the VE table. And the calculated numbers in g*K/kPa suggest to lower the values in the VE table by way more than that, almost 30%.

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Is your IFR table correct for the injectors...?

    You said FPR is un-referenced, right...?

    Measure rail pressure (in psi) at idle, and observe pressure as you snap throttle open and then shut... what did rail pressure do...?
    Injector values are stock and correct.

    Yes, unreferenced. Corvette fuel filter close to tank with no manifold vacuum feed.

    I'll borrow a fuel pressure gauge and try to get a read as you described.
    00 Silverado Z71, LQ9 w/ LS3 heads, BTR cam, Whipple 2.9@8#, 4l80E

  3. #623
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    New calc_pids.txt attached here...

    changes:
    - added STFTBEN,
    - removed VE[%] (since VE[g.K/kPa] is simpler to use).
    Attached Files Attached Files

  4. #624
    Member Whipped383's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Thank you
    97 K1500, 383, 4L60E, Whipple, Stock 14 Bolt with 3.73, EFILive V2, 0411, Marine, #42 Injectors, H-Boost, LC-1, Coming Soon: Intercooler, Trutrac, 4.11 gears?
    03 K2500HD, 8.1 and Allison, Stainless works long tubes, Intake mods

  5. #625
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    New calc_pids.txt attached here...

    changes:
    - added STFTBEN,
    - removed VE[%] (since VE[g.K/kPa] is simpler to use).
    when i click on the calc_pids.text link a box comes up saying invalid log file and i cant pull it up.

  6. #626
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zayne0 View Post
    when i click on the calc_pids.text link a box comes up saying invalid log file and i cant pull it up.
    You're trying to open calc_pids.txt directly in the scantool...

    do this:
    - close scantool,
    - save calc_pids.txt to folder Documents\EFILive\V7.5\User Configuration,
    - now open the scantool,
    - on PIDs tab select the relevant calc pids (including any dependent pids).

  7. #627
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    You're trying to open calc_pids.txt directly in the scantool...

    do this:
    - close scantool,
    - save calc_pids.txt to folder Documents\EFILive\V7.5\User Configuration,
    - now open the scantool,
    - on PIDs tab select the relevant calc pids (including any dependent pids).
    Alright i tried that and i keep getting an invalid pathway message when i try saving the calc_pids.txt to the Documents\EFILive\V7.5\User Configuration I dont understand why it keeps wanting to open directly to the scan tool.
    nevermind i got it! thanks for your help!
    Last edited by zayne0; October 3rd, 2015 at 03:08 PM.

  8. #628
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    It's ok now...?


    ( in the webbrowser you have to go rightclick->Save Link As )

  9. #629
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Yes It's working good now. Another question though, my new maf table I copy and pasted into the b5001 it has a couple spikes (i know I have to smooth) but then maxes the table out halfway through the table. Engine is an lq4 with ls1 heads and ms3 camshaft.

  10. #630
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default MAF curve

    When you see spikes (up or down), manually flatten them out, avoid doing too much smoothing, make the rest of the curve (not hit in the log) follow the shape/curvature of the corrected portion of the curve.

Page 63 of 75 FirstFirst ... 1353616263646573 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Please explain table A0007 TPS VE TABLE cos5
    By WHYTRYZ06 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 06:26 PM
  2. OLFA table vs. Custom OS A0008 table
    By 1bar in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 6th, 2007, 06:25 AM
  3. Table Names vs Table Number
    By lplott in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 17th, 2006, 05:14 AM
  4. Main VE Table ?, Logged data vs VE Table
    By dbaxter_ss in forum Tips and tricks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 26th, 2004, 03:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •