Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: KR after Full Flash new OS...

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    53

    Default KR after Full Flash new OS...

    Upgraded a 2001 PCM with the 2002 OS 12212156. Copied all my data over from the old tun to the new OS tune and saved the data. Wrote it to the PCM and took a test drive. Im seeing 1.8degree of KR and about 6% higher average STFT while tuning. MAF off tuning VE with STFT. Any suggestions?

    Oh yeah and this is part throttle btw ... 2000RPMs

  2. #2
    EFILive Crew Site Admin Tordne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,870

    Default

    Check your injector tables to start with. I know in the Commodore anyway that the 2002 model changed injectors from a 26 ->28 lb (from memory). That will make a difference for sure
    Andrew
    EFILive Crew


  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    53

    Default

    My injectors are big boys...65lbs I changed their flow rate though already

    2001 Chevy Silverado VE Tuning OLD.tun
    2001 Chevy Silverado VE Tuning NEW SYSTEM.tun

    Log File

    Log_0005.efi

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Hmmm i think i MAY see the problem..if someone can double verify for me i would feel much better...in the log i supplied at frame 607 im at 0.0 KR, Frame 608 same thing. Now I notice my spark advance here is at 15* which threw me off caue i didnt thnk it should be that low. For some reason it is defaulting me into the low Spark table in the tune. In this low spark table you can see that at the Map pressure vs RPM im curretnly at 15* then on frame 609 I get 1.6* KR when the Map Pressure vs RPM changes. I let off the throttle as it changed and it jumped from 15* to 25*. I just now over wrote that low spark table with my high spark table settings which is now like my old tune as far as that goes

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,935

    Default

    LTFTs are deactivated, and you only ever command 14.68:1 AFR, are you ever getting into PE? Wheres your wideband data? Do you have a lower tstat too, I dont think 174F is hot enough with a stock tstat.

    What are your mods? Why do you need 65lb injectors, you're barely using them (but this doesnt show any WOT runs so I cant say for certain).

    Are you running SD but still have the MAF hooked up? It kinda looks that way but I could be wrong.
    ~Erik~
    2013 Sonic RS Manual - 1.4L I4T E78, tuned, turbo mods, etc.
    2008 TrailBlazer SS 3SS AWD Summit White - LS2 E67/T42, bolt ons, suspension, etc.
    2002 Chevy TrailBlazer LT 4X4 Summit White - 4.2L I6 P10, lifted, wheels, etc.

  6. #6
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    Looks like he is running CLSD (he has a MAF DTC, but B4205 is set for closed-loop.).

    OP, you have in effect disabled PE by setting B3616 to 100%. Is that what you want?..You will not get any enrichment at all (even WOT).
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Yes thats exactly what i want right now...im tuning the VE table via STFT!!! So i disbaled LTFT for now, and MAF to run the SD. Turned off the PE for now as well so its not writing 0's in and spoofing the logged data

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Sorry Mod list ... 383 stroker motor,160* tstat, LT's, full bolt ons, 4L80E ... 8.5:1 comp. Its the foundation for an STS turbo but until the turbo is bought im setting it up N/A as best as possible. Reverse split cam so on so on. My trim before i swapped OS though were pretty awesome...0 to -2 STFT . I tried recopying the VE last night and it looked like some of the cells never got written so i will try this morning and post up when i get to work. I log data every morning on the way in, make changes, load data on the way out, the drive home make changes....i have this VE almost perfect. Until last night ive never seen KR on this motor but i think what i posted was the issue so ill let you know here in about an hour or so.

    My injecctors are so big cause its waiting on the turbo. They see about 56% duty cycle max N/A so should be real nice when i swap in the Turbo right off the bat

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Alrigt heres the update....STFT Effin beautiful, I mustve missed clicked on the VE table when i copied and pasted cause it is dialed in again nicely!!! As for the knock though, im seeing as high as 2 degrees in a cell or two and some misc. 1's+ in a few others. Generally in a a cell range of 1800 RPM - 3600RPM and .36 gs/cyl to .84gs/cyl. Im assuming that the new OS must have a more sensitive setting on the knock sensors!? I didnt copy and paste my old knock sensor settings simply because I figured the changes made to that section in the new OS were probably made for a reason. Im working with the new OS knock settings for now, so I knocked off 2 degrees of timing in that whole range of cells i mentioned. Ill see if that gets the knock taken care of.

  10. #10
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    I'm assuming your posting because you want advice and help. You are hitting high MAP and cylinder loads without any fuel enrichment. Thats a recipe for KR and engine damage.

    You probably will not find one tuner on this board who will endorse turning off any fuel enrichment to 'not get zero's ' when tuning closed-loop. There is no EFILive publication that endorses that 'technique'.

    I take it you have a workable wideband. Why not just do the AUTOVE? It utilizes STFT Tuning in conjunction with keeping ample fuel to prevent detonation.

    Its your vehicle, but just some friendly advice from a forum member...
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Why cant I full flash?
    By 01Blackerado in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: March 17th, 2011, 09:11 PM
  2. Pre Full Flash to Full Flash Tune Question
    By Donovan in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 13th, 2010, 11:43 AM
  3. Full Flash
    By L31Sleeper in forum Vortec V6/V8 Specific
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 26th, 2009, 09:25 PM
  4. HELP cant full flash
    By Madspeed in forum Duramax LLY
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2007, 06:05 PM
  5. Full flash
    By minytrker in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: June 11th, 2006, 05:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •