Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Lots of questions (mostly on sensors)

  1. #1
    Senior Member johnmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    137

    Default Lots of questions (mostly on sensors)

    My plan is to front mount turbo and blow through a carburetor while retaining most of the factory electronics/engine controls on a 99 Silverado 1500 5.3L. I have some ideas on engine controls but need some tips so I don't start heading down a path that is obviously (to more experienced tuners) not going to work. I have V2 up to date.

    Current plan uses bone stock long block as GM put it in the frame, replaces intake with an edelbrock LS style Performer RPM dual plane aluminum intake, knock sensors stay, ect sensor stays, MAP sensor is replaced by either a 2 bar or 3 bar GM, TPS is the Innovate Carb TPS kit earlier GM style TPS, stock coils and ignition, Oxygen sensors for tuning as Needed, I have a new AEM UEGO wideband gauge/sensor and can use 1 or 2 NB sensors if for some reason they are needed. I would like to eliminate the Maf if possible if nothing else for more of a simplistic approach, I would then use a separate IAT sensor and would need to figure out which one is best to use and where is best to put it (before or after the carb). The PCM will not be handling fuel and I want to kill all DTC's related to removing all the injectors and pulling that chunk of harness. I want spark to be adjusted for Boost, IAT, ect, heat soak and any other variables that will effect optimum timing. The goal is for the 4l60 to still shift properly, cruise to work, IAC to stabilize idle and coast rpm. The Air pump/egr will go and I want to turn off all DTC's related to that as well.

    The goal is to push the limits of the stock assembly to put down track times, knowing that a boost adjustment and minor retune is all thats needed to make it more of a DD. I have been asked why I don't use the MSD ignition controller box for the LS intake and one of the reasons is that I want all of the other stuff on this truck to work. In an old muscle car it might be an option, but I think this way it will also be able to adjust for boost much more accurately.

    Here are the problems I am currently trying to solve,
    Do I need to run a MAF or can I run MAFless or create a SD tune?
    Will the maf be able to accurately read airflow under boost of 10/15/20lbs without error if I determine I need to run a MAF?
    Once that's figured out how do I rebuild the VE table (assuming I would even need to?)

    I find that to use a 2 bar or 3 bar map sensor I need a install a COS?
    How do I go about getting it from EFI Live, will it cost me anything, what is involved in installing it?

    Do I zero out the TPS manually by adjusting it in the bracket it mounts on or can I set zero and 100 percent electronically somehow? I assume the latter but how?

    Those are some of the big problems I am worrying about right now. Hope you guys can help me get started on this. As you can see I love to dive in head first and then see if I can swim

  2. #2
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    Lots of good questions.

    I will handle one of your questions.

    No, you do not need a MAF. Many people have successfully tuned without one. The only issue I might debate is that not having a MAF makes it more simplistic. A MAF has a lot of resolution frequencies to work with, and Airflow is also a function of vehicle speed. So its not a worthless Tuning parameter. But, if your airflow exceeds ~ 512 g/s with a Turbo..then going SD or COS is appropriate.

    Maybe for practice you can try the CALC.VET Method of Tuning: http://forum.efilive.com/showthread....tire-VE-Table. Closed-Loop Tuning (with NB's) is a good place to start. Closed-Loop is very forgiving. Get that wideband hooked up ASAP. V2 allows for a serial connection..then its just Plug & Play for the most part.

    I'll let others handle your other questions..

    ..Good luck..
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


  3. #3
    Senior Member johnmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Thank you! I agree, I am thinking the airflow will prevent me from trying to run a MAF on this one. I will get that wideband mounted and start messing with this thing stock before I try to get even more over my head than I am.

  4. #4
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    You mention blowing thru a carburetor... this make things very complicated and isn't necessary, the PCM running a COS has sufficient fuel control; if you peg the MAF then go SD.

    With boost, a manifold-referenced FPR will make the IFR table very easy to set.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member schwoch1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    202

    Default

    I have to ask, why do you want to use a carburetor??????????? Use the EFI system that GM gave you, it works quite well and is fairly easy to tune when it is all up and running. I was kinda paranoid about tuning my first turbo EFI project, but after about 4 hours of tuning in one day, it was pretty much spot on. If you really want to use a carburetor and use the factory ignition, it can be done, just basically shut off the codes for injectors, program it to be in speed density, and go from there! I recomend though sticking with the EFI...... but tha tis just my opinion....
    Hope this helps

    Mike
    Current toys are as follows:
    1961 Chevrolet Corvair Monza, 145 H6/powerglide. 85 HP of raw fury.... slow and stock and staying that way!
    1969 GMC 2500, 4-53T Detroit diesel/Fuller 10 speed on late model 1500 HD frame
    1970 GMC 9500, 6-71 Detroit/Fuller 13 speed, not sure why I bought it, but it sure is noisy!!!
    1975 Ford F100 shortbed. Currently undergoing Crown Vic subframe swap and EFI 4.6!!!
    1975 Chevrolet Vega, 5.3/200-4R may finish someday, maybe...

  6. #6
    Senior Member johnmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Thank you Mike, that was kind of what I wanted to know. If ditching the electronic fuel injection, then closed loop (and any reason to keep a Maf sensor) are out the window. After that, I am now wondering how to make an SD tune out of the parameters I can still determine, knowing that all the pcm is controlling is timing, idle air control, and shift (and perhaps the other factors I am still too green to know). It should be simple since I no longer have to worry about anything related to controlling fuel injectors, the carburetor will simply mix fuel according to airflow. My main concern is providing the correct timing for this application as well as drive-ability and shift control that the PCM provides.

    Can anyone help with creating a SD tune from the inputs left as well as using a custom operating system with a 2 or 3 band MAP sensor?

    Also any help with dialing in a new TPS sensor? I havent had to mess with that yet and will need to on this project for sure since the new "throttle body" (carb base) range of motion is different than stock?

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Hi guys, i'm a noob here. Done heaps of reading and can't seem to find the answers to my problems.
    I am trying to do a CALC.VET tune on my LS1-B using FS V2 and LC1 WB02.
    I have gone over the tutorials religiously, rewritten/copied my Calc.pids etc and log maps.

    When I log and follow the tutorial I get data in the range of 0.9 but my main VE table data has data in the range of 46-98 (ish).
    My FS was giving the WB02 data out as AFR and the calc.pid selected is for lamba. If this wasn't the problem I am lost for answers.

    I am hoping for a summary response on the settings for FS V2 using LC1 WB02 as the tutorial is obviously correct and I am following it. I am certain the response I seek would help other noobs, I am sure it is a small misunderstanding on the configuration with FS and my WB02.

    My Main VE table is in % as per the CALC.VET tutorial but could do with an insight as to the correct units to utilise Tune tool also (to be sure).

    My WB02 gives a pretty constant 11.0-12.8 AFR when cruising so I am eager to get this set up so I can correct it.

    Thanks in advance for your replies and thanks for all the tireless work you people have done in the tutorials and development. I am glad I went with EFILive as the HPT forums don't seem as much as a helpful community.

  8. #8
    R.I.P Shawn, 1956-2011 WeathermanShawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,807

    Default

    Hi Mark..welcome to the Forum.

    You might want to start a new thread. While your topic is similar to johnmaster, you usually get more responses when starting your own new thread.

    Once you start your new thread, let us know all of your modifications, OS, current tune, any logs you have, etc. Sounds like you are just having trouble with setting up your Units properly.

    Talk to you later.
    2002 Black Camaro Z-28 M6 Hardtop 11.0:1CR 425HP/410TQ SAE (400TQ@3500RPM)
    200cc Heads, 228/232 110+2 Cam, 1 3/4" LT's w/catts, GMMG, Koni Shocks, Hotchkis Springs, 35/21 Sways, 17" ZR1's, 3.90 Gears Roadrunner PCM LM-2 Serial Wideband
    EFILive Closed-Loop MAF/SD Hybrid Tune..


  9. #9
    Senior Member johnmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    137

    Default

    I am also glad that I went with EFI live so far, sounds like they work tirelessly to keep up to date and solve their users problems.

    Is there a link to info about obtaining the COS I will need for a SD tune and a 3 bar map sensor? The cos page of the website talks all about the various operating systems they offer but doesn't say how to obtain or use them... I don't want to start messing with my tun file only to find out I need a different one.

  10. #10
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    +1 start a new thread and post tune file and any log files.

    There is a COS5 thread, at the end of it is a COS5.txt file which summarizes what you have to do: Custom-OS-5

    All the COS's are included when you install the V7.5 software.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Setting rear O2 sensors to act as bank 1 (primary) O2 sensors
    By T34418L31 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 6th, 2010, 03:59 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: October 5th, 2009, 12:04 PM
  3. First-time AutoVE, LOTS of questions...
    By Mr. P. in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 31st, 2009, 08:32 AM
  4. Lots of boost... Not much power
    By pistonrings in forum General (Diesel)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 29th, 2009, 03:50 PM
  5. Lots of questions
    By nonnieselman in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 17th, 2008, 09:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •