I too was a MAF follower.....yes I admit it. (I do believe it's a great sensor when recalibrated as needed)
I was very wrong .......HumpinSS/Dirk was very right.
There are a couple of ways to intuitively see the inherent inaccuracies of the MAF:
1.) The existance and utilization of the VE table.
2.) LTFTs and STFTs.
The MAF is an inexpensive, reliable sensor which enables GM to meet federal standards.
The really NEAT part of all this, for me, is how far tuning has come from the old days of spreadsheets and voodoo.
Thank you.... EVERYONE!!!!
joel