Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: auto cal capacity?

  1. #11
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Log 0005 shows it takes 8.7 s to go 9-65 mph... is this street or dyno...?


    I see boost, slow gear changes, this is a heavy vehicle.

  2. #12
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Thanks with driver it would be 3300 lb without driver the car weight is 3100 lb. The vehicle was on the street not dyno

  3. #13
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Log shows that at WOT car is slow (especially for boost)... something is wrong... has it been tuned...?

  4. #14
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Yes its tuned its a new chevy Cruze 1.4T so it is not fast to begin with.I made those logs right after i tuned it.One had a lot of wheel spin and the other was done with it moveing along slow.It does seem to run fairly stronger tuned.Stock the boost is around 12 or 13 psi.I think its running 18 or 19 now.Plus its kinda heavy for that small motor to.Maybe the numbers would look better if i put some miles on it before i logged it?

  5. #15
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Ah, ok, I was imagining a 6.2L truck (what most people have)... it's all clear now.

  6. #16
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Try logging ETCTP instead of TP.

  7. #17
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    From your log 0005, I very roughly calculate that your engine makes 260 HP at the flywheel.

  8. #18
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,935

    Default

    Wow, thats double GM's stock output there Joe!!

    Im thinking Im going to get a Sonic here soon, the Cruze needs a slightly bigger engine IMHO but in the Sonic is seems fun. Might have to test drive an RS if the local dealer has one.
    ~Erik~
    2013 Sonic RS Manual - 1.4L I4T E78, tuned, turbo mods, etc.
    2008 TrailBlazer SS 3SS AWD Summit White - LS2 E67/T42, bolt ons, suspension, etc.
    2002 Chevy TrailBlazer LT 4X4 Summit White - 4.2L I6 P10, lifted, wheels, etc.

  9. #19
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    I was going by the logged POWER_RW accelerating up and coasting down, oblivious of controlled conditions (especially the coast down)...

    lol, which shows how experiments fail


    How much HP would he have...?

    From his log his 0-60 would be about 9s... so he would be closer to 150 HP.

  10. #20
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Thanks would you mean 150hp to the wheels?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. AUTO CAL question
    By restless@westnet.com.au in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 1st, 2012, 11:26 AM
  2. auto cal problems
    By lewis1 in forum AutoCal
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 15th, 2012, 07:36 AM
  3. New to the auto cal need some info
    By da-sparky in forum AutoCal
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 16th, 2011, 03:15 AM
  4. Where's the Auto Cal
    By L31Sleeper in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 23rd, 2010, 05:30 PM
  5. Auto Cal out?
    By 98redorangeta in forum FlashScan V2 BB Logging
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 25th, 2008, 04:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •