I think doing this would really mess up data for tuning where having all .450 in all CL modes is a good idea.
But after you could raise and lower them depending on what you need for idle and what your trying to accomplish is cruise areas of CL Mode. Could work well as a lean cruise for OS without one, could cause to Lean a condition with Lean Cruise... not sure I'd want to tweak this and have lean cruise enable at same time... all theory at this point.
But thinking about this and how GM has changed O2 swing points over the years it may explain how they were trying to get a richer condition with ever changing fuel supplies?
First thing to do is know exactly what closed loop mode your in, this is linked to Scantool, but the 02 switch points are not. If you open your cal_link.txt file on approx line 174 you'll find Closed Loop Mode. Add this underneath to look like this:
Code:
;Closed Loop Mode
B4107.ROW=SAE.MAF,GM.MAF,GM.DYNAIR
;O2 Switch Points
B4105.ROW=SAE.MAF,GM.MAF,GM.DYNAIR
Save the file and reopen the Tunetool and play back a data log and you can see exactly what CL mode you are in. Change a CL mode from .450 .450 to .350 .350 and datalog to see how Wideband 02 AFR/Lambda reacts?
Remember leaner creates more heat then rich. Even if you look at lean cruise settings in a GM Factry Holden calibration it is not smooth, it will jump around from max lean to richer, leaner and never a steady state. I don't know if this is for cylinder/piston heat or Cat effeciency? Even very early GM lean cruise cals back in 80s and 90s had an on time off time... that said I've have run a TBI truck in lean cruise from 15.7 to 16.2 steady, no off time for 40K miles and no issues... 1990 Chevy Suburban 2wd and average 18.5 mpg highway, best ever was 19.2 mpg. 15 mpg is the worst I can do all in town in winter...