Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 82

Thread: Looking for some pointers on maf tuning.

  1. #11
    Lifetime Member swingtan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,589

    Default

    CFCO should be disabled full stop.....


    If you don't mind the slight rich spike you get on the gear change, you get a smoother change disabling CFCO. The only time I've turned t on is when I was playing with open throttle shifting ( which worked well for racing, not so much for daily driving ).

    You can always filter the log data if you don't want to turn it off, but it's better to.

  2. #12
    Member TJWells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    62

    Default

    ok
    I logged some data with maf turned on. no cl/stft/ltft/dfco/cfco. After filtering, I have a few .9 areas @73kPA and up as well as 15-31. How do I corrolate. B1097,B1098 to my log. I believe I need to lower these numbers but how much and where.
    I think I logged the wrong data. If so what should I log?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Clipboard01.jpg 
Views:	265 
Size:	259.0 KB 
ID:	14942
    Last edited by TJWells; April 29th, 2013 at 12:44 PM.

  3. #13
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Create 2 maps that look identical to B1097 and B1098...

    do this like so:
    - in tunetool, for each of B1097 and B1098 one at a time, do copy-with-labels,
    - in scantool, create a new map (name it according to the table it maps),
    - on Row and Col tabs do Paste Labels (this will dimension the map to match the table),
    - on Data tab choose CALC.WO2BEN (see note below),
    - on Data tab set Precision to 3 or 4,
    - on Data, Row, Col tabs checkmark Show Units,
    - on Cell tab checkmark Constrain Size,
    - save the map,
    - repeat for the other map;

    note: since you have CL/LTFT/STFT disabled, you will be using CALC.WO2BEN as the correction factor (and ignore both CALC.LTFTBEN and CALC.SELBEN).


    Then, you take some logs, you look at both maps, you apply the low cell count filter and the transient filter, then for each map you copy the whole map and do paste-with-labels into the table it maps (B1097 or B1098), do this for both tables (with their respective maps).

  4. #14
    Member TJWells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    62

    Default

    - on Data tab choose CALC.WO2BEN
    Joe this is giving me some trouble. I can't find it. Even if I uncheck selected. I selected Base Efficiency Numerator lc-1 e38 style (factor). Is this right?
    I have also added the calc pid to my bbx logging.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Clipboard01.jpg 
Views:	244 
Size:	119.9 KB 
ID:	14950

    CALC.WO2BEN as the correction factor (and ignore both CALC.LTFTBEN and CALC.SELBEN).
    Ok I was feeling like I learned something, now I think I missed the last semester.
    CALC.W02BEN as the correction factor? Totally lost.
    CALC.LTFTBEN and CALC.SELBEN never used them to even know to ignore them.
    Man do I fell stupid right now.
    Last edited by TJWells; April 30th, 2013 at 01:44 PM.

  5. #15
    Member TJWells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Morning Joe!
    I found that if I checked the names box I could find the correct pids. Went to my cal.pids text and figured out the rest.
    I am now confident that I have the maps set up properly. Can you direct me to information on defining calc.pids versus other types of pids? right now I'm following direction, but would like to understand better. I believe I understand the theory of CALC.WO2BEN as the correction factor. But i'd like to be informed.

  6. #16
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Hi TJW,

    BEN is measured Lambda divided by commanded Lambda

    [ noting that EQR = 1/Lambda as some OS's provide EQR rather than Lambda (or vice-versa) ]
    [ noting that AFR = Lambda*StoichAFR ]

    WO2BEN definitions for various ECMs:
    LS1: CALC.WO2BEN = "{EXT.WO2LAM1}*{GM.EQIVRATIO}"
    E38: CALC.WO2BEN = "{EXT.WO2LAM1}/{SAE.LAMBDA}"
    else: CALC.WO2BEN = "{EXT.WO2LAM1}/({GM.AFR}/14.63)"

    is that what you're using for E38 (the second one)...?

    example:
    say measured lambda was 0.9 and commanded lambda was 1.0,
    this means that measured lambda indicates combustion is richer than what was commanded,
    the BEN factor is 0.9/1.0 = 0.9
    so to correct the difference between measured and commanded Lambdas, the table sourcing the airmass calculation has to be multiplied by 0.9.

  7. #17
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    There's a section in the scantool user manual pdf regarding calc pids.

  8. #18
    Member TJWells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    62

    Default

    is that what you're using for E38 (the second one)...?

    Where would I check to see if this is what I'm using? In the CALC.PIDS text file or when I pick the pid to log or somewhere else even?

  9. #19
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TJWells View Post
    is that what you're using for E38 (the second one)...?

    Where would I check to see if this is what I'm using? In the CALC.PIDS text file or when I pick the pid to log or somewhere else even?
    In the scantool, on the PIDs tab, on the pid CALC.WO2BEN do rightclick->More Info and see what it says...

    also, look in your calc_pids.txt file, look at how the CLC is defined for CALC.WO2BEN.

  10. #20
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Post your calc_pids.txt file here so I can look at it (sanity check).

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Tuning changes going from 85mm MAF to LS7 or other 100mm MAF?
    By PRAY in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 21st, 2012, 02:11 AM
  2. timing pointers. . .
    By truethinker in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: June 25th, 2012, 04:23 AM
  3. 2005 silverado 5.3 need some tuning pointers
    By whiteboy631 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: December 22nd, 2010, 10:00 AM
  4. New to EFI need some pointers plz
    By shadyst in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: November 24th, 2009, 04:58 PM
  5. Stock maf = perfect idle. Big maf = unstable idle. Any tuning suggestions?
    By onfire in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: July 11th, 2006, 03:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •