Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Big VE Difference Between AutoVE & Calc.VET

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default Big VE Difference Between AutoVE & Calc.VET

    Hi. My car is a H/C/I M6 '02 Camaro. After I finally got calc.vet to work I made a log to see how far off my VE table was. Then I made another log run for AutoVE. The problem - Calc.VE shows my VE table needs to increase but AutoVE shows the VE table needs to decrease. Note I made the 2 logs runs with the same base tune and did not apply the Calc.VE corrections before running AutoVE. Clearly I'm doing something wrong. Any ideas?
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Hi TI,

    Those logs are before applying the results to the base tune...?

    Can you post screenshots of your Calc.VET maps and AutoVE map...?

    Post the calc_pids.txt file you're using.

    After you do AutoVE, what do your LTFT's and wideband show...?

    After you do Calc.VET, what do your LTFT's and wideband show...?

    I take it you're running with the MAF.

  3. #3
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Does you IFR table match your injectors...?

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Joe,

    Yes, these logs are before applying any changes. I didn't apply the updates since the two were so different and I assumed something was screwed up. I have 36# injectors and the tables were updated for them. Yes, I am running MAF, its an 85mm truck unit. The MAF table has been tuned a little bit. I made a quick log run and tuned < 7000 w/ LTFTs and I had the car on a dyno and the tuner tuned the upper end (don't ask why he didn't do the whole thing).

    Update - Today I started from scratch and double-checked my LC-1 configuration. When I connected and opened the software I found everything was per the manual except lambda was selected instead of AFR. I know it was set correct before, but somehow it changed. I assume that will cause problems, maybe some of that I'm finding here.

    I made a plain log run today after correcting the LC-1. It wasn't an AutoVE or calc.vet log, just a log with the straight tune (attached). LTFTs averaged -2.9 to -3 on that log run. Maybe I should re-run calc.vet or AutoVE?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5-4-13_#1_autove.jpg 
Views:	227 
Size:	213.0 KB 
ID:	14979   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5-2-13_#3_calc.vet.jpg 
Views:	209 
Size:	181.2 KB 
ID:	14980   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5-5-13_log_run.JPG 
Views:	207 
Size:	163.8 KB 
ID:	14986  
    Attached Files Attached Files

  5. #5
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    For AutoVE you should be using CALC.WO2BEN...

    For Calc.VET you should be using CALC.SELBEN.


    I'll take a closer look at your files tomorrow...

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Thanks Joe. I'll give it another try with my corrected LC-1 (weather has been crappy here anyway). I understand CALC.W02BEN for AutoVE and I saw in the "tutorial" where I should use CALC.SELBEN for the MAF table but what 'data' do I use for the VE table map?

  7. #7
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    I'm still looking at your files, I'm running behind.



    Calc.VET:
    - MAF: paste-multiply CALC.SELBEN,
    - VE: paste CALC.VET [g*K/kPa],

    noting that Calc.VET corrects the existing MAF and calculates a new VE from that.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 83
    Last Post: September 5th, 2023, 11:30 AM
  2. Help on my first calc vet
    By 400ss in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: January 25th, 2013, 09:18 AM
  3. Calc vet ???
    By Chuck L. in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: September 8th, 2011, 01:12 PM
  4. Calc VET
    By pormgb in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: August 28th, 2011, 09:39 AM
  5. Calc.VET, VET Map Average is all 0.0?
    By n8dogg in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: July 15th, 2011, 01:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •