Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Understanding differences between FlashScan and LS1_Edit tun

  1. #1

    Default Understanding differences between FlashScan and LS1_Edit tun

    My engine calibration is stock; I've only changed things like fans and gear ratio. I got my FlashScan cable yesterday and have captured my old LS1_Edit setup, restored the stock setup, captured that and now am recreating my changes in FlashScan. There are a few discrepancies I'd like to understand. The quotes will compare the FlashScan version against the LS1_Edit version.
    {G0901} Fan #1 Turn-on Temp
    CAL: "210" <===> ALT: "207"
    ...
    All four of these are off by 3° F. Is this just a matter of LS1_Edit botching the conversion from the internal value to F?
    {D0901} Part throttle 1->2 Shift Speeds
    Different from cell: 0,0 to cell: 3,16 inclusive.
    ...

    {D0910} WOT 1->2 Shift Speeds, Normal
    CAL: "44" <===> ALT: "40"
    ...
    I assume FlashScan is adjusting the automatic transmission shift points even though my car is a manual. (Seems like the right way to do it.)
    {D0401} Enable CARS.
    CAL: "Disable" <===> ALT: "Enable"

    {D0402} Enable CARS Lamp
    CAL: "Disable" <===> ALT: "Enable"
    This is covered in a different thread; FlashScan has a different way of disabling CAGS.
    {H0103} Differential ratio
    CAL: "3.73" <===> ALT: "3.73"
    This is covered by: "Values that differ by more than 0.0001 are considered different."
    {H0101} Vehicle Speed Sensor Pulses per Mile
    CAL: "47018" <===> ALT: "51280"
    This is a good one; it looks like LS1_Edit doesn't adjust the odometer; I assume my mine has been clocking off 9% more mileage since I installed my new gears. In addition to the obvious, I guess I've been rotating my tires and changing the oil 270 miles early each 3K cycle... And oh yeah, my fuel mileage calcs have been off. Neato!

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Boy am I glad to see someone else seeing these.

    Thought I was losing it.

    I did the same thing pulled current tune off with efi and put the old stock tune on with ls1edit, pulled off with efi and put the current back on with efi.

    All I can say is WOW!!!!! 3 minutes pulling off and 30 seconds back on.

    That ROCKS!!!!

    sure glad I didn't have to pull it off with ls1edit first, well unless I needed to get a good half hour nap

  3. #3
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    leres,

    My engine calibration is stock; I've only changed things like fans and gear ratio. I got my FlashScan cable yesterday and have captured my old LS1_Edit setup, restored the stock setup, captured that and now am recreating my changes in FlashScan. There are a few discrepancies I'd like to understand. The quotes will compare the FlashScan version against the LS1_Edit version.
    It's not clear to me what the 2 calibrations CAL and ALT are (...you compared x to y, what're x and y...?)...?
    :?: :idea: :!: :?

  4. #4

    Default

    I made the same changes (e.g. 3.73 gears) to the stock calibration using FlashScan and LS1_Edit. CAL is the FlashScan version and ALT is the LS1_Edit version. I would expect them to be more similar than they are.

  5. #5
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leres
    I made the same changes (e.g. 3.73 gears) to the stock calibration using FlashScan and LS1_Edit. CAL is the FlashScan version and ALT is the LS1_Edit version. I would expect them to be more similar than they are.
    A quick test...

    Start your engine with AC off, and as it warms up log ECT and STATE06 (contains bitflags for FAN1 and FAN2/3); then when FAN1 turns on, look at the ECT and see if it matches 210 (EFILive) or 207 (LS1edit) degrees. Let us know of the result.

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member GMPX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    13,148

    Default

    We have covered this temp inaccuracy before, it is not us.
    I can show you the maths if you wish?.

    Cheers,
    Ross

  7. #7
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    I don't doubt it, but being an engineer I'm interested in the math anyway.
    :wink:

  8. #8

    Default

    My assumption is that LS1_Edit is doing the math wrong; but I'll do the test and report back so we're sure.

  9. #9

    Default

    I ran a quick test when I got home tonight. My stage 1 fan settings are 210/201° F; that's what EFILive reports the ECT is when the fans go on and off. (No surprise!)

    However, there's something wacky going on with the speedometer calibration; I'll post info in a new thread.

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    688

    Default

    When I was using edit i seen the same issue with the fan temps being off by about 2-3* lord only know what other numbers werent saved as they were inputted

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 99-02 and 03-06 differences
    By DURAtotheMAX in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 25th, 2009, 03:48 PM
  2. Need help w/P1626 and an understanding.
    By 98 tigershark in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 9th, 2009, 06:14 AM
  3. Need help with understanding MAF adjustments.
    By Redline Motorsports in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: January 18th, 2009, 03:38 PM
  4. Understanding VE and MAF
    By 98 tigershark in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 17th, 2008, 09:58 AM
  5. B1015 need help understanding
    By carcrafter22 in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: November 26th, 2007, 04:08 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •