Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: AutoVE commanded AFR issue

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default AutoVE commanded AFR issue

    Hi, I am doing autove tuning on my turbo LQ4 and have been getting good results right down to 1.00 but have noticed that for some reason the commanded AFR actually leans out as I put my foot down and increase map. I have no idea why it is doing this as I have set all the commanded fuel tables as per the tutorial. I am running COS 5. The commanded AFR gets above 16:1 and the WBO2 is matching it under high loads. I would like to work out whats going on before i start on the BoostVE

    cheers

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default

    It would be a good idea to post your tune and logs. That will help diagnose the fault.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Ok, here is my SDautoVE tune. Unfortunately the logs are on a different computer so I will load later. If someone could have a quick look over this tune that would be great

    Edit: Have actually noticed that the B3647 table is commanding a leaner lambda at high map. I will change it to the inverse of these figures. Is this a possible typo in the tutorial?

    Cheers
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by ttls1; November 28th, 2013 at 11:08 AM.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default

    B3647 is commanding a leaner mixture as that is what you are asking of it. Your units are in EQ ratio so less than 1 is leaner and greater than 1 is richer than the value you set in B3601 (Ratio of Air to Fuel Stoichiometry). Lambda works in the opposite manner which is what your B3647 seems to be set to. So make the figures as you say the inverse of what you have now for a starting point. Someone more knowledgeable with boosted applications will be of more use than I as to what to set them to.

    You PE is also only at 1 so in PE mode it is likely to command an EQ of 1. Not the best idea especially if boosted. I would change it. There is a post that says to set B3618 to the 105kpa column of B3647 however I believe that was for naturally aspirated applications so am unsure if is applies to boosted applications such as yours.

    Your VE table (B0101) has a few holes so the logs you used to change it would be helpful. In addition Commanded Fuel vs RPM (Normal) (B3647) has many values set to 1. This will set you to semi open loop (SOL) so your short term fuel trims will be active. You need ensure no values are set to 1. Set them to .99, .999, 1.001, anything but 1 so they will not affect your calcs for B0101.

    I have only had a quick look as have to duck out however. Just wanted to start the ball rolling. I am sure someone else will chime in for sure. Most likely more experienced than me especially with boosted applications.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Double post.
    Last edited by Woodchukka; November 28th, 2013 at 03:47 PM. Reason: Double post

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    289

    Default

    From my reading around here, boosted PE can be as rich as .77 lambda
    14 GMC Sierra
    5.3L CC SB 4x4
    Basic tuning....

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Thanks for the replies everyone, I made the changes and its behaving correctly now. I have the main VE basically finished and will start on the boostVE. I am going to autoVE the boost ve table but was wondering what happens with the commanded afr over 105kpa? I am looking for an afr of 11.5:1 at 12psi but as the commanded afr at 105kpa is 12.8:1 must I fudge this ritchening factor using the boost VE table? If so this will affect the BEN factor during autoVE wont it? Just not too sure how you all do it. Any info will be greatly appreciated.

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member darcy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    223

    Default

    You can use B3647 to command you non-boost fuelling, above 105kPa the 105kPa commanded fuel will be maintinaed.
    You can then use PE fueling, and set to active at say 120kPa, to command a richer boost fuelling; or as you have suggested, you can fudge the boost VE table to give you whatever actual AFR you like.

  9. #9
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ttls1 View Post
    ...

    Edit: Have actually noticed that the B3647 table is commanding a leaner lambda at high map. I will change it to the inverse of these figures. Is this a possible typo in the tutorial?

    ...
    In the tunetool, go Edit->Properties and set Fueling units to EQR (the default is Lambda)... then restart the tunetool and redo B3647 so that it is correctly rich.

    When viewing B3647 (or any other table) take a close look at the upper right of the graph display, it shows the units.

  10. #10
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    If you're following the AutoVE tutorial, modify it as follows:
    - if you have a serial wideband, for the BEN pid use CALC.WO2BEN from the Calc.VET thread (this uses GM.EQIVRATIO x EXT.WO2LAM1);
    - set B3618 to suitably rich for boost if you run boost;
    - set PE MAP enable B3613 to 110 kPa (i.e. so B3618 takes care of boost) <-- what darcy said above.
    - set PE TPS enable B3616 to same as 2002 Camaro;
    - set B3647 higher MAP columns to suitably rich for sub-boost;

    Do not set B3618 to EQR 1.00.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Commanded AFR not equal to WBo2 AFR at idle.
    By macca33 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: April 6th, 2012, 12:56 PM
  2. AFR Commanded... Where else other than PE???
    By Behold in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: October 27th, 2011, 01:27 AM
  3. Cold AFR doesn't follow commanded AFR
    By LS1_Dragster in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: August 17th, 2009, 02:50 PM
  4. Commanded PE AFR Issue
    By nm2769 in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 9th, 2008, 12:10 PM
  5. AutoVE Commanded Fuel Question
    By SOMhaveit in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: October 10th, 2007, 12:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •