Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: New Haltech WB1

  1. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    28

    Default

    How else would you do it Joe?

    Also, does this calc.pid look right?

    Thanks,

    Millsy
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #12
    Lifetime Member Tre-Cool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    941

    Default

    well when u get it fully worked out let me know. as i have a few to setup too. haha

  3. #13
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Millsy View Post
    How else would you do it Joe?

    Also, does this calc.pid look right?

    Thanks,

    Millsy
    That's just it, it can't be done unless both both devices (gauge, V2) have high impedance inputs (10 Mohms or greater)...

    do an experiment: have both devices tapped in, and using a DMM measure the voltage... then remove/untap one device and see if the DMM shows the same voltage... if it does then you're ok;

    if DMM shows a different voltage then you to avoid tapping directly... it won't be as simple as a constant voltage offset.

  4. #14
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Millsy View Post
    ...

    Also, does this calc.pid look right?

    Thanks,

    Millsy
    The calc_pids.txt is almost right...

    add at least 2 blank lines at the end of it (after the last line of text);

    also note that the AFR units is already defined, so you don't need to define it.

  5. #15
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    What stoich AFR does the Haltech assume (does it assume 14.7)...?

    If you know this, you could add lambda as well...

    For example:
    Code:
    . . .
    *CLC-00-001
    V                  0.0           5.0       .1  "{EXT.AD1}"
    AFR               10.0          20.0       .2  "{EXT.AD1}*2+10"
    lambda             0.5           1.5       .4  "{CALC.AFR_WB11}/14.7"
    . . .
    CALC.AFR_WB11     F001  CLC-00-001    "AFR,lambda,V"    WO2-Analog    "Wide Band AFR 1 - WB1"
    . . .
    and same for CLC-00-003.


    [ there are various reasons to use lambda, see the Calc.VET thread ]
    Last edited by joecar; February 11th, 2014 at 10:22 AM.

  6. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Thanks for your help Joe

    Cheers,

    Millsy
    Last edited by Millsy; February 16th, 2014 at 12:59 AM.

  7. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Thought I would give you guys an update,

    Re wired the wideband connecting all the negatives/grounds together

    Laptop is now seeing correct AFR for plx calc.pid I.e. 2.25v AD1 = 14.5 AFR

    The gauge does however read about 0.2 - 0.3 AFR higher so I just ignore it when tuning

    Thanks to everybody who took the time to reply,

    Millsy

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Haltech HWC Wideband
    By caver in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 27th, 2007, 08:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •