Why is the VS V6 xml file so basic in parameters compared to all the other holden xml's??
Why is the VS V6 xml file so basic in parameters compared to all the other holden xml's??
It's all good until it goes "Bang"
I must confess I remember about 1% of the old ALDL stuff, so I don't know, but TBH, V4 is what it is, it is free now isn't it?
I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.
I love efilive. But V4 / aldl stuff hasnt had any love around here for a loooong time.
I use TunerPro software and Moates Hardware for everything pre LS1... it is still in active development with an active online community. The definitions are extensive for almost any delco pcm you can name... jump to http://pcmhacking.net/ if you want a viable alternative to efilive v4
goodluck
Yeah,I know about tunerpro and pcmhacking,and no,V4 is still US $199,you may think V4 is what it is,but just that little bit more in the VS xml would be nice.
It's all good until it goes "Bang"
Sorry I didn't realise that, V4 is Paul's little baby.
I no longer monitor the forum, please either post your question or create a support ticket.
We are looking at making V4 a free product once ALDL support is implemented in the EFILive V8 (FlashScan/AutoCal) package.
Regards
Paul
Before asking for help, please read this.
V4 is still a very good package for ALDL logging, the charts aren't like what we are used to with v7 but when it was released it was certainly the best around and still is in terms of ALDL software, I wish I had the ability to plot on different scales and zoom but I'm sure that will all be addressed in V8..
The definitions on the TunerPro stuff is only very recent addition. 3 years ago the definitions for logging were pretty sparse. You can look at the items defined in TunerPro and add them to V4 if you want. It's not too difficult
Just wondering what other Holden definitions you're comparing the VS V6 one to? Most of them have very similar content to the VS V6, except the gmh-vr68vs8.xml which is more extensive (has more bidirectional controls) because that's the vehicle that we did most of the development work on (i.e. reverse engineering) for the ALDL data stream.
Regards
Paul
Before asking for help, please read this.
Hit the nail on the head, it's more the bidirectional stuff that would be nice. Had car on dyno,would of been so nice to have been able to lock trans in gear.
It's all good until it goes "Bang"
I have no idea if the VS V8 bidi controls would work on a VS V6 but its worth a try.
Regards
Paul
Before asking for help, please read this.