Page 35 of 44 FirstFirst ... 253334353637 ... LastLast
Results 341 to 350 of 437

Thread: Head Cam Intake ls1 2002 trans am

  1. #341
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jetmech442 View Post
    Just to make sure, this is with the ltft cells changed from like 1100 to 2600 or something like that right?... Not the 6000 and 6001?

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
    yeah I changed them to 1400, 2200, and 3000 RPM

  2. #342
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jetmech442 View Post
    Oh yeah thanks! That's an important one that isn't very intuitive. It's nice when others confirm what I'm trying to convey/or correct me if I'm wrong,or fill in knowledge gaps.

    This has been an awesome thread, although long, I think it details a lot of good info. It's definitely helped me get a deeper understanding of the ls1b cause want to know what I'm saying will help. When I tuned mine, there was a lot of "let's see what this does" type flashing.

    And actually oreo, seeing how clean and stable you got your idle has convinced me to go back and redo mine since I'm running hybrid open loop at idle (I clearly don't need to since yours had a larger cam than mine).

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
    Thanks man I definitely owe my success to you, Joecar, and Statesman! Yeah my idle is definitely very stable now. It wasnt an easy process but once I found out the base air flow I just modded the decay rates enough to get it where I want it. I am thinking about even lowering it to 800 RPM because I am still not having stalling problems. I also have the FAST 102mm throttle body which I heard of professional tuners not even trying to tune it because of idle problems so I feel pretty accomplished to say the least lol!

  3. #343
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    +1 statesman said to go OL until you get bank 1 NBO2 fixed.

  4. #344
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    +1 statesman said to go OL until you get bank 1 NBO2 fixed.
    I also agree, but why doesn't his other bank record values? His log shows both LTFT flat-lined, even though the other 02 is reading (albiet not very well).

    He also shows OL for sae.fuelsysA the whole log

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

  5. #345
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    If you're going to go this way, yes, correct, disable any NBO2 trimming (see below).

    CL: B4205: disable
    LTFT: B3801: disable
    STFT(OL): B4206: disable
    SOL: B3605, B3647: eliminate stoich cells.
    I dont have a b3647. What was this supposed to do? Also, for B3605 I just made the highest value .96

  6. #346
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oreobadr View Post
    I dont have a b3647. What was this supposed to do? Also, for B3605 I just made the highest value .96
    GM OS has B3605, this is ECT vs RPM.

    EFILive COS replaces B3605 with B3647 which is MAP vs RPM.

  7. #347
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    You can use 0.98 EQR or 1.02 EQR, these are sufficiently far from stoich to avoid STFT trimming during OL (aka semi-open loop, SOL).

  8. #348
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    ...

    EFILive COS replaces B3605 with B3647 which is MAP vs RPM.
    which gives much better OL fueling control over the MAP range.

  9. #349
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    which gives much better OL fueling control over the MAP range.
    Gotcha thanks.

    So I ran some more testing and updated my tune accordingly. I am pretty sure the car does not run lean anymore! It runs really well, idles great, and I think the data is more consistent now that I am only using the wideband.

    Now to tackle another issue. I have bucking at 0% to light throttle from 1500-1800 RPM. My timing isnt jumping so what could it be?

  10. #350
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    735

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oreobadr View Post
    Now to tackle another issue. I have bucking at 0% to light throttle from 1500-1800 RPM. My timing isnt jumping so what could it be?
    Your cam.... you can try adjusting timing and airflow to minimize it, but some cams just like to buck at lower rpms.

Page 35 of 44 FirstFirst ... 253334353637 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. B8010 Intake Cam Filter
    By TBMSport in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 6th, 2013, 04:11 AM
  2. Bad MAF calibration post Head/Cam swap - help?
    By bimbleuk in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: July 25th, 2013, 07:44 PM
  3. Problem with my Head/Cam 98 LS1 camaro - files attached
    By blackflag in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 157
    Last Post: May 10th, 2011, 05:27 PM
  4. 2000 Camaro Head and cam tune file.
    By DaddySS in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 12th, 2007, 11:10 AM
  5. A question for you head and cam guys.
    By johnsZ06 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: April 12th, 2006, 07:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •