Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45

Thread: Question about LTFT

  1. #31
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirktdolman View Post
    Here is a run with the changes

    Attachment 20287

    Attachment 20288
    You set PE to Lambda 1.175 (i.e EQR 0.85)... this is why your log shows EQR 1.0 during WOT (PCM will not go leaner than EQR 1.0)... this is dangerously lean.

    when you look at B3618 or B3605, pay attention to the units (see upper right panel).


    Do this:
    - open tunetool,
    - go Edit->Properties and set Commanded Fuel Units to EQR, and click Ok.
    - exit tunetool,
    - restart tunetool,
    - goto B3618 and set it to EQR 1.175.
    - save file and flash to PCM.

  2. #32
    Member Dirktdolman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Original Value in the 1500 hz cell was 0.209783. I added 12% to that, making it 0.23495696. So do I add another 3.5% (making it 0.2420056688) or remove 3% from the 0.23495696 (making it 0.227614555)?
    2003 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 6.0L Automatic 4 X 4

  3. #33
    Member Dirktdolman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Is this what you are talking about?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Properties.jpg 
Views:	150 
Size:	62.0 KB 
ID:	20289

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B3618.jpg 
Views:	193 
Size:	408.4 KB 
ID:	20290
    2003 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 6.0L Automatic 4 X 4

  4. #34
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirktdolman View Post
    Original Value in the 1500 hz cell was 0.209783. I added 12% to that, making it 0.23495696. So do I add another 3.5% (making it 0.2420056688) or remove 3% from the 0.23495696 (making it 0.227614555)?
    Sorry, I meant take 3.5% back out.

  5. #35
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Yes. Click the +.00 button to increase precision

  6. #36
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    Sorry, I meant take 3.5% back out.
    After adding 12%, take 3.5% back out.

  7. #37
    Member Dirktdolman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    92
    2003 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 6.0L Automatic 4 X 4

  8. #38
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Ok, trims look to be closer to zero...

    there are a few things I still don't like:
    - I like to see the HO2Sx1 voltages get to 920 mV, but your log does not show any WOT.
    - I like to see no KR.

  9. #39
    Member Dirktdolman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Not sure about the HO2Sx1 but I did see the KR. What do I need to do?
    2003 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 6.0L Automatic 4 X 4

  10. #40
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    What fuel are you running...?

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Another LTFT question
    By picnic_george in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 25th, 2010, 12:53 PM
  2. A question of balance (LTFT)
    By Wolfie in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 25th, 2010, 08:41 AM
  3. LTFT Question
    By stevedarman in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 1st, 2009, 07:35 PM
  4. LTFT question
    By driver456 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: July 2nd, 2006, 12:29 PM
  5. LTFT cells question
    By driver456 in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 16th, 2006, 09:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •