Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Tuning without IAT Data

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default Tuning without IAT Data

    It has been stated that IAT data on a Radix is bogus due to major heat soak. The sensor has been relocated to the cast intake. So much for accurate and consistent SD/AutoVE/Custom OS tuning with a Radix.

    Any suggestions to get around the IAT issue?
    Last edited by DrX; June 12th, 2006 at 03:43 PM.
    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    **EDIT**Don't relocate the IAT to the filter area and plug the factory hole...
    Last edited by SSpdDmon; June 13th, 2006 at 01:00 PM.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
    Relocate the IAT to the filter area and plug the factory hole.?.?.
    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NEVER

    never do that , what happens if the intercooler fails the engine has no way of knowing what is going on.

    IAT in the manifold on a positive displacment combo is the best place for it , yes it will react a little slower due to the heat soak but it should still give the PCM the correct signals to correct for rising intake temps.

    Usually I can see a 30 deg intake rise during the course of a dyno run when the aftercooler is not working efficnetly , you are looking for delta IAT to make correctiosn to keep the motor safe , under conditions of high airflow low boost the heatsoak is not a issue as the sensor is being cooled by the air rushing past it.

    Make sure you are using a sensor that protrudes enough into the airstream and that will alleviate the heatsoak effect , remember also that at low airspeeds the air in the manifold is also being heated by this same heatsoak

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member SSpdDmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    My bad...I was thinking N/A...not boosted. Doh!

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
    My bad...I was thinking N/A...not boosted. Doh!
    Yes N/A you want it as close to actual outside temps as you can get

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Mag states that you risk engine damage if you rely on Radix IAT data due to the heat soak/slow response. So SD is not compatible with the Radix.

    The slow IAT response could also expalin why AutoVE does not work well for me. Makes accurate SD idle tuning impossible as well. From my experience it would require a separate Idle IAT VE Multiplier table.

    Does a more responsive IAT sensor exist?
    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrX
    Mag states that you risk engine damage if you rely on Radix IAT data due to the heat soak/slow response. So SD is not compatible with the Radix.

    The slow IAT response could also expalin why AutoVE does not work well for me. Makes accurate SD idle tuning impossible as well. From my experience it would require a separate Idle IAT VE Multiplier table.

    Does a more responsive IAT sensor exist?
    Do you have a pic of the intake setup I assume you have a cooler inside the manifold to help control intake temps ?

    Auto VE will be hard with a blown combo to do on the street as it is very hard to hold steady state for periods of time , auto ve doesnt really work if you cant hold each rpm /map point for at least 5-20 secs if you just drive through each point you will get transient data.

    I do a lot of supercharged stuff with os3 and have done for nearly 4 years ( early development days of efilive before flashscan even existed ) IAT soak has never been a issue with careful tuning. You can weight how much the IAT affects timing through careful use of the rpm multiplier tables as well as the base IAt tables.
    If the IAT rises above normal parameter then you start pulling timing pretty savagely to safeguard the engine , as well as adding more fuel.

    The custom OS IAT compensation tables as well as the charge blending tables are your best friend here.



    A good base tune doesnt take hours , it takes weeks/months to get a good baseline starting point before honing in on the power stuff

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Here are a few pics. The IAT sensor is located under the snout. You can't see it in the first pic because of the hoses. You can see it internally in the third pic.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Radix1.jpg 
Views:	243 
Size:	96.4 KB 
ID:	697   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Radix2.jpg 
Views:	246 
Size:	107.3 KB 
ID:	698   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Radix3.jpg 
Views:	246 
Size:	91.8 KB 
ID:	699  
    2017 Camaro SS, 2014 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 6.7L, 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 4̶X̶4̶(now 2WD), 5870lb race weight, 10.93@ 124, Twin TVS1900s, Twin Throttle, 429 LSX, 4L80E, custom 14 bolt rear, V2, R̶o̶a̶d̶R̶u̶n̶n̶e̶r̶(dead), COS3......
    Gettin' the Groceries

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrX
    Here are a few pics. The IAT sensor is located under the snout. You can't see it in the first pic because of the hoses. You can see it internally in the third pic.
    Looks a lot like the one I did on a hummer last week. Used a new custom OS for the 06 hummer ( a big thanks to Ross for doing it while still jetlagged from his trip to the states - what customer service )






    The IAT in the manifold gave good consistant result .

Similar Threads

  1. need help VX commodore data log
    By limited cv8r in forum EFILive V4
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 9th, 2010, 02:39 PM
  2. What types of computers will the EFI Live data tuning work on?
    By Gusdieselboy in forum Duramax 06 LLY / 06+ LBZ & LMM
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 28th, 2009, 03:43 AM
  3. Log data freeze
    By Rusty in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: January 20th, 2009, 08:40 AM
  4. Data Log steps
    By meshoooo in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: October 25th, 2008, 07:05 AM
  5. L92 Data log
    By etmotorsports in forum Gen IV V8 Specific
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 26th, 2008, 05:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •