Thanks to everyone that responded to my post yesterday. It was very helpful. Thanks to you, this has been a big and rather pleasant learning curve for me.
I think I have approached the tuning backwards. It was my plan to work with the VE table and then finish with the two PE tables. But if I understand your comments correctly, all of you are saying set the PE tables first and then get the VE table to cause my AFR to match the PE. After looking at JoeCar's logged data itappears that he was trying to get his AFR to match his command fuel values.
Let me know please if this is what I should be trying to do.
If so, I would like to set my AFR to be a little lean on the low RPM side for the better fuel economy, and around 12.5 or 13. at peak torque.
Does this sound like the right approach?
Finally, when working with the VE table, it's my understanding that no values should exceed 100. and if they do, the PCM will just round them off to 100.
Is that a correct notion? And if that is correct, what does it mean when you need to raise those numbers above 100 to keep from being too lean?
Thanks again. I know this is elementary to most of you, but it's all new to me.
Tony