Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 66

Thread: Fast90 Woes - Leanness

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member TAQuickness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,940

    Default Fast90 Woes - Leanness

    Mostly a rant, but I'm open to y'alls opinions/suggestions.

    This is a long outstanding problem of mine. Have a fast 90 and inconsistant AFR's between banks. Running a dual wideband setup, left and right bank in the primary O2 locations. I'm 99.999999999999999999999999999% sure this is a hardware problem. To date, here's what I've tried:

    Swapped injectors from bank to bank, no change

    Replaced injectors, no change

    Swapped injectors again, no change

    Found two exhuast leaks, fixed them, no change

    Tightened intake manifold, no change

    Double checked vacuum lines, no problems here

    Found crack in #7 runner, JB weld, no change

    Crack on #7 turned into broken chunk, replaced lower shell, made new gasket, slight improvement. From here, the left bank would run 2 points higher under 2k RPM. Above 2k RPM, both banks tracked within 0.5 AFR

    Remade gasket, Right bank now running leaner than left

    Tightened right side of manifold, right bank = commanded, left is off by 1 - 1.5 AFR

    Tightened left side manifold, shit hits fan, both banks lean, left ~ 15.5:1, right, ~ 20:1

    I'm not sure what's left to try.


  2. #2
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Mate, that's gotta drive a person insane...

    Sanity check using stock manifold (if you're feeling up to removing it yet again...)...?

  3. #3
    Guess who's back!!!! Black02SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,355

    Default

    Have you swaped WB Locations?

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member TAQuickness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,940

    Default

    crazy? insane? all of the above? yes! I've RR'd the manifold some 20 times in the last 2 months. I'm sure it's in the manifold becuase the leanness changes slightly each time.

    Chad - thanks for the reminder. I've also tried:

    swap right to left - no change
    both WB's on right - AFR's within .05
    Both WB on left - AFR's within .05
    20 pt WB calibration - AFR's within 1 - went back to stock LC1 config
    All new port gaskets (OEM & Comp)
    New x2 upper/lower gasket per write up supplied by Arkay (found on LS1 tech)

    Have not tried an OEM manifold. Sold them (LS1 and LS6) when I picked up the FAST. Anyone have a stocker I could borrow?

    I'm seriously thinking to try that blingy PP manifold in the near future.


  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Bruce Melton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    674

    Default

    I know many disagree but I think FAST manifolds just suck (or suck where they are not meant to). I could never get my brand new one to seat properly and it kept losening up even with locktite. In the end I cracked the LS6 valley cover which I learned is not unusual. This says that the manifold was bottoming out. It could be that the FAST gaskets are thicker than GM?
    I gave up and went back to LS6/Shaner with no problems.

    2000 C5 Coupe, 6M, Callies/Mahle stroked LS7 (441), Blackwing, Halltech, LS3 intake, 90mm Shaner TB, ported L92 heads, FAST 50# inj, not too much cam, Kooks 1 7/8" headers , 3" catless mid pipes, Z TIs, track suspension, , 3:90 rear, EFI V2, LM-2, etc.
    PowrMax Performance

    100 mm PowrMAF

    LM-2 EFILIve package with TAQ -sLM2 V-2 serial cable> Package deals

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member TAQuickness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Melton
    I know many disagree but I think FAST manifolds just suck (or suck where they are not meant to). I could never get my brand new one to seat properly and it kept losening up even with locktite. In the end I cracked the LS6 valley cover which I learned is not unusual. This says that the manifold was bottoming out. It could be that the FAST gaskets are thicker than GM?
    I gave up and went back to LS6/Shaner with no problems.
    I'm feeling much the same.


  7. #7
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    702

    Default

    yup, i also agree. they flow great, but damn, could you please make them out of a different material than my cheerios bowl?

  8. #8
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    240

    Default

    I Have seen them bottoming out on the valley cover bolt heads.
    \"You Can Never Have Enough Horsepower\"

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member TAQuickness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,940

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by caver
    I Have seen them bottoming out on the valley cover bolt heads.
    Can you elaborate on this vision? I'm using the flat valley cover bolts supplied with the manifold, but I won't rule it out till I can.


  10. #10
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Pics...?

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. strange leanness
    By mr.prick in forum Gen III V8 Specific
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: September 13th, 2007, 03:37 PM
  2. Fast90 joys
    By ringram in forum Lounge
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: June 1st, 2007, 12:15 AM
  3. 2-Bar Woes
    By NAH in forum Forced Induction and Nitrous Oxide (N20)
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: December 12th, 2006, 12:58 PM
  4. Fast90 swap what do I need?
    By ringram in forum Lounge
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: October 11th, 2006, 09:41 PM
  5. Wideband woes
    By purrvert in forum General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 11th, 2006, 04:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •