Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 50

Thread: Speed Density VS MAF

  1. #11
    Lifetime Member Tinbender59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    289

    Default

    My problem is that I need to understand what every acronym means and how it does what it does. Then how all that works together. Lol i almost flunked electronics school because of transistor theory, talk about mind boggleing!! At the time. Lol

  2. #12
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    230

    Default

    Those are air flow basics. Nothing super special in what I typed. Basic engine knowledge and intended use seem to be rarely thought about these days. It’s just moving air. If the air isn’t moving uniformly how can you rely on a air only reading....

  3. #13
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    The ideas are this:
    1 give the MAF a chance to read the air flow properly (straight tube for 6").
    2 set PE fueling to be safe.
    3 make sure PE is enable-able.
    4 correct VE table (with MAF disabled).
    5 correct MAF table (with VE disabled).
    6 enable MAF and VE, figure out blending point/rpm (as Team208 said).

    Usually, steps 4 and 5 are done with CL/trims all disabled, using only a wideband;

    Calc.VET takes a few shortcuts to quicken the process:
    a. it uses trims/LTFT for CL and wideband for OL,
    b. it corrects the MAF table using a.
    c. it also calculates a portion of the VE table from b.
    d. the rest of the VE table has to be smoothed to c.
    e. this VE table now has to be logged to see if it needs correction (we've seen many cases where it was ok, just needed minor tweaks for cam/idle).

  4. #14
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    The ideas are this:
    1 give the MAF a chance to read the air flow properly (straight tube for 6").
    2 set PE fueling to be safe.
    3 make sure PE is enable-able.
    4 correct VE table (with MAF disabled).
    5 correct MAF table (with VE disabled). This one I have found to be a problem at times if you are going to run a blended VE/MAF. In dynamic calculation the larger cams, heads, intakes, will show a different air flow on the MAF vs dynamic. Due to non steady airflow.
    With the VE set perfect we will just blend the MAF to dynamic so the air flow matches. Then once in steady state you are MAF only anyway.

    6 enable MAF and VE, figure out blending point/rpm (as Team208 said). This point could be hard to find at first but a good starting point is 500-1000 rpm over converter stall. After stall load if constant.

    Usually, steps 4 and 5 are done with CL/trims all disabled, using only a wideband;

    Calc.VET takes a few shortcuts to quicken the process:
    a. it uses trims/LTFT for CL and wideband for OL, This one is another one I do different. I've seen too much surging induced from not getting a clean fuel trim during transient. Thats when it locks to the last known trim and not steady fuel trim. This can make cells not get hit with the actual trim, just the last known. This can be filtered out but takes a better understanding of what to filter out and how to get the data needed.
    b. it corrects the MAF table using a.
    c. it also calculates a portion of the VE table from b.
    d. the rest of the VE table has to be smoothed to c.
    e. this VE table now has to be logged to see if it needs correction (we've seen many cases where it was ok, just needed minor tweaks for cam/idle).

    I'm just listing what works for me in my apps. This is completely different app to app, build to build and tuner to tuner.

  5. #15
    Lifetime Member Tinbender59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    289

    Default

    Man am I behind the curve on this stuff.

  6. #16
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    230

    Default

    This isn’t recreational for me. I’d hope I’m up on it. Lol

  7. #17
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Team208Motorsports
    5 correct MAF table (with VE disabled). This one I have found to be a problem at times if you are going to run a blended VE/MAF. In dynamic calculation the larger cams, heads, intakes, will show a different air flow on the MAF vs dynamic. Due to non steady airflow.
    With the VE set perfect we will just blend the MAF to dynamic so the air flow matches. Then once in steady state you are MAF only anyway.
    I've seen a few cam's (I'm just a part-time tuner) have an upstream effect on MAF, so making MAF follow VE makes sense (rather than vice-versa);
    I'm always comparing VE-calculated airmass (g/cyl) vs MAF-calculated airmass (g/cyl).


    6 enable MAF and VE, figure out blending point/rpm (as Team208 said). This point could be hard to find at first but a good starting point is 500-1000 rpm over converter stall. After stall load if constant.
    ok, good to know, thanks;
    points out that converter behavior allows cam to do its job, and so has an indirect "upstream" influence on MAF; good one

    a. it uses trims/LTFT for CL and wideband for OL, This one is another one I do different. I've seen too much surging induced from not getting a clean fuel trim during transient. Thats when it locks to the last known trim and not steady fuel trim. This can make cells not get hit with the actual trim, just the last known. This can be filtered out but takes a better understanding of what to filter out and how to get the data needed.
    I make the transient filter to be wide enough to hopefully avoid the influence of the last known trim;
    but, I would like to come up with a better filter.

    I'm also playing with filtering airflow g/s transients and airmass g transients.

  8. #18
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tinbender59 View Post
    Man am I behind the curve on this stuff.
    Read the summary notes (you'll run into them), get your feet wet, sanity check everything, ask questions;

    remember a basic few rules:
    - make sure powertrain is sound (no leaks, no noises, no overheating, no worn-out parts);
    - make sure injector tables match injectors (measure rail pressure);
    - air source (i.e. MAF or VE) is separate from fueling;
    - set the fueling (to be safe at high load), and correct the air source;
    - eliminate all but one source of air, this is what you're trying to correct;
    - eliminate each trim unless you're using it to do correction (watchout for OL STFT);
    - make sure wideband works properly;
    - use wideband for OL (don't use trims, in OL these are not updated and so are wrong);
    - filter out transients (i.e. data where throttle and/or airmass are not sufficiently steady);
    - load up the engine (i.e. dyno works much better than driving uphill);
    - avoid going lean;
    - avoid misfires;
    - avoid knocking;

    fueling can come from multiple sources (the richest of the active modes/tables wins), but this shows up in the fueling pids, so you don't have to worry too much about this.

  9. #19
    Joe (Moderator) joecar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    28,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Team208Motorsports View Post
    This isn’t recreational for me. I’d hope I’m up on it. Lol
    It seems like you're up, you can tell by how your customer's cars run.

  10. #20
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joecar View Post
    It seems like you're up, you can tell by how your customer's cars run.


    Thank you sir.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Speed Density Charge Temp Blend Factor (MAF g/sec)
    By Gelf VXR in forum General (Petrol, Gas, Ethanol)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 9th, 2015, 10:41 AM
  2. Harrop Hurricane MAF vs Speed Density
    By RD in SD in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: April 27th, 2013, 04:45 AM
  3. Speed density
    By catman3126 in forum Petrol / Gas
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 15th, 2011, 04:18 PM
  4. speed density
    By mikesp1 in forum E37, E38 & E67 PFI ECM's
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: July 31st, 2007, 05:29 PM
  5. speed density
    By 69camaro5speed in forum Custom Operating Systems
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 14th, 2006, 06:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •